Placebos work

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

According to a new study people who knowingly take a dummy pill or placebo may benefit from it. These pills are usually made from sugar or other inert non-harmful materials. Usually when used in clinical trials patients are unaware whether they are taking the tested drug or a placebo to ensure the medical benefits of a potential new drug are assessed rigorously. However this new study published in the science journal PLoS ONE, found placebos may work even when patients are aware that they are taking them.

For the study lead author Ted Kaptchuk associate professor of medicine Harvard Medical School and director of the Asian Medicine and Healing Program and his team conducted a three-week trial of 80 patients suffering from irritable bowel syndrome. One group was given no pills, and the other given pills honestly described as “like sugar pills”. They were told to take the pills twice daily. 59% patients treated with the placebos reported adequate symptom relief compared to 35% in the group taking no pills. Midway through the study, side effects were reported by three placebo patients. By the end of the study, five placebo patients reported side effects, such as respiratory infection, pain, diarrhea, and rash.

According to Associate Professor Kaptchuk, “Not only did we make it absolutely clear that these pills had no active ingredient and were made from inert substances, but we actually had ‘placebo’ printed on the bottle… We told the patients they didn’t have to even believe in the placebo effect – just take the pills.” Although a small study he believes these results suggested there “may be significant benefit to the very performance of medical ritual” of using placebos. Senior study author Anthony Lembo, of the Harvard Medical School added that the results surprised him. He said, “I didn't think it would work…I felt awkward asking patients to literally take a placebo. But to my surprise, it seemed to work for many of them.”

The study was funded by Harvard Medical School’s Osher Research Center and by the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States.

Dr. Ananya Mandal

Written by

Dr. Ananya Mandal

Dr. Ananya Mandal is a doctor by profession, lecturer by vocation and a medical writer by passion. She specialized in Clinical Pharmacology after her bachelor's (MBBS). For her, health communication is not just writing complicated reviews for professionals but making medical knowledge understandable and available to the general public as well.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Mandal, Ananya. (2018, August 23). Placebos work. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 19, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20101227/Placebos-work.aspx.

  • MLA

    Mandal, Ananya. "Placebos work". News-Medical. 19 April 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20101227/Placebos-work.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Mandal, Ananya. "Placebos work". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20101227/Placebos-work.aspx. (accessed April 19, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Mandal, Ananya. 2018. Placebos work. News-Medical, viewed 19 April 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20101227/Placebos-work.aspx.

Comments

  1. FancyScrubs FancyScrubs United States says:

    This study is really amazing, is it mind over matter or the routine of taking a pill? Either way, it seems our minds are our most powerful organs.

  2. David E. Connolly, Jr. David E. Connolly, Jr. United States says:

    The conclusion drawn from this study defies rationality; the patients may have suspected that they were being lied to and that they were, in fact, taking real medication.  Whether the patients were conscious of their suspicions is another matter.  Another suspicious aspect to the conclusion drawn is that the performance of the medical ritual of receiving placebos caused the effect; not so: more likely, the patients suspected that in spite of the possibility that they were not receiving real medicine, that they were still being looked after by real doctors, and that this attention from a doctor might have benefits in and of itself.  In my opinion, the conclusions did not take into consideration many other perhaps more viable explanations for the patient's subjective reporting.  

    • Austin Austin United States says:

      Three weeks, 80 patients...  That is 40 patients per group. That means nearly 40% of patients with no treatment received positive results? The correlation of only 60% of the experimental group receiving positive results is not causation, and creates a very weak inductive argument. I would like to, as the gentleman above described, that post hoc/ergo propter hoc fallacies, also known as false cause, can easily be hypothesized here. More research is needed to determine the effectiveness of all types of notification of placebo reception.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
AI and predictive medicine: Recent advances