Senate Democrats release FY11 CR that seeks to preserve foreign aid, State Department funding at FY10 levels

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Senate Democrats on Friday introduced a FY11 continuing resolution (CR) to fund the federal government through September, "with a vote on the measure, as well as a House-passed proposal, expected" this week, the Washington Post's "2chambers" blog reports (Sonmez, 3/4). In a press release, the Democratic-controlled Senate Appropriations Committee "highlighted a series of significant differences between [its proposal] and the House-passed fiscal 2011 spending measure (HR 1) on the national security front," CQ reports.

"Democratic appropriators carved out a far broader view of what qualifies as national security activities than did House Republicans, who lumped funding for diplomacy, foreign aid and nuclear and weapons-of-mass-destruction nonproliferation efforts into their non-security discretionary spending bill," the news service writes. The Senate's CR aims to keep funding for the State Department, foreign aid and homeland security at FY10 levels. The proposed House budget would cut those accounts and others for a total of $61.5 billion in reductions. "While the bill is not expected to survive a test vote in the Senate" this week, it "draws the battle lines between the Democratic and Republican agendas, particularly those in the House, who have been the most aggressive in pushing for cuts," according to the news service.

The Senate measure's view of foreign aid and State Department funding as part of national security reflects "an approach that both civilian and military leaders in the Obama administration have strenuously promoted," CQ notes. "Global health and food security programs and funds to help mitigate the international effects of climate change would all face huge reductions in the House bill - programs that advocates say have important security implications, given the threat that a pandemic could pose to the United States or that food and water scarcity will generate future conflicts (Cadei, 3/4).

The Appropriations Committee release states that the Senate measure "preserves U.S. leadership in key areas such as global health and child survival, providing $885 million more than HR 1 for life-saving health programs, and $1.1 billion more to respond to humanitarian crises. The Senate CR also provides $428 million more than HR 1 for clean energy technology and other global environment programs, and $200 million for the global food security fund to offset food shortages and famine, which HR 1 does not fund at all." The release also highlights the House budget's impact on PEPFAR. "HR 1 provides $4.845 billion for PEPFAR, a reduction of $654 million, or 11.9%, below the FY 2011 request level. That will mean some 400,000 people will not receive life-saving antiretroviral treatment and 300,000 orphans and children will not receive care and support," it says (3/4).


http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Maternal influences on food allergy prevention: A closer look at diet and environment