House GOP plans vote on canceling health bill provision on medical education

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

House Republicans plan another vote on a bill to roll back a spending provision of the health law. Plus some question whether Senate candidate Tommy Thompson is out of step with other Republicans on health care reform, and what OMB's role was in the latest ACO regs.

The Hill: House GOP Take Another Swing At Federal Health Care Funding Next Week
House Republicans next week plan to approve another bill targeting the automatic federal funding of health care programs that was established in last year's health care law. Republicans plan to take up H.R. 1216, which would terminate more than $200 million in funding over the next decade that is currently slated to fund training for graduate-level medical students. That funding was put in place by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act last year, through language that amended the Public Health Service Act (Kasperowicz, 5/19).

The Washington Post: Tommy Thompson's Health Care Problem
Tommy Thompson is a popular former governor with near-universal name recognition in his home state — two traits that might lead you to believe that he will be the odds-on Republican nominee to replace retiring Wisconsin Sen. Herb Kohl (D). But Thompson has one big problem — health care. President Obama's health care law has become a touchstone for conservatives who see it as the most egregious example of the "government can solve our problems" mentality of the current Administration. And, Thompson has long been a rare Republican advocate for the intent — if not the particulars — of the law (Weiner, 5/19).

Politico Pro: Sources: OMB Raised ACO Savings Goals
The Office of Management and Budget's fingerprints are on at least two of the provisions of the proposed accountable care organization regulations most disliked by potential ACOs, according to multiple sources close to the administration. OMB insisted on requiring all ACOs to face losses if their delivery reforms do not produce expected savings within the first three years, a provision CMS strongly resisted (Feder, 5/20).


http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Canadian moms mostly stick to vitamin D rules for breastfed infants and young children, study finds