Opinion pieces respond to U.N. special rapporteur's report on reproductive health policies

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Several opinion pieces respond to a report (.pdf) presented on Monday to the U.N. General Assembly by Arnand Grover, U.N. special rapporteur for the Right to Health, that "considers the impact of criminal and other legal restrictions on abortion; conduct during pregnancy; contraception and family planning; and the provision of sexual and reproductive education and information," according to the report summary. The report also states, "Realization of the right to health requires the removal of barriers that interfere with individual decision-making on health-related issues and with access to health services, education and information, in particular on health conditions that only affect women and girls. In cases where a barrier is created by a criminal law or other legal restriction, it is the obligation of the State to remove it" (8/3).

  • In her "Global Health Blog," Guardian health editor Sarah Boseley writes, "Arnand Grover says in a hard-hitting but carefully argued report that all states should provide safe and legal abortion services for [women] -- as well as contraception." She adds, "Grover will no doubt come under personal attack from some of those who are fundamentally opposed to abortion on ideological grounds, but what makes this an interesting report -- and a powerful argument -- is that it is based on a cool analysis of the impact of restrictive laws on women's human rights" (10/24).
  • Lydia Duran, executive director of the Association for Women's Rights in Development, and colleagues write in a TrustLaw opinion piece, "Feminists are heralding the report's findings and recommendations for clearly stating links that women's rights activists and health practitioners have understood for years -- namely, that it is a combination of adequate resources; access to a full, integrated range of reproductive and sexual health services; removal of legal barriers; and intentional commitments by governments to upholding and ensuring rights that actually translates into positive health outcomes." They add, "The Rapporteur is taking unprecedented steps and now governments and civil society must (continue to) do their part to fully protect, respect and realize women's sexual rights and reproductive rights" (Duran et al., 10/24).
  • Marianne Mollmann, a senior policy adviser with Amnesty International, writes in an RH Reality Check opinion piece, "Restrictions on abortions just don't work in that they don't result in the desired outcome. ... The truth of the matter is that abortion restrictions in law and policy have little if anything to do with how women and girls deal with their pregnancies" (10/20). RH Reality Check published two other pieces responding to the report, one from Luisa Cabal of the Center for Reproductive Rights and another from Meghan Doherty of Action Canada for Population and Development (10/25).

http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Study assesses how the Dobbs ruling changed permanent contraception procedures among young adults