Study finds older women can wait up to 15 years to repeat bone scans

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

The researchers reported that osteoporosis developed more slowly than anticipated.

The New York Times: Osteoporosis Patients Advised To Delay Bone Density Retests
Bone loss and osteoporosis develop so slowly in most women whose bones test normal at age 65 that many can safely wait as long as 15 years before having a second bone density test, researchers report in a new study. …  Medicare pays for a bone density test every two years and many doctors have assumed that is the ideal interval, although national guidelines recommend them only at "regular intervals" (Kolata, 1/18).

The Associated Press: Study: Many Women Can Skip Frequent Bone Scans
New research could mean millions of older women can skip frequent screening tests for osteoporosis: If an initial bone scan shows no big problems, many can safely wait 15 years to have another one, the study suggests. ... The new study feeds concerns that the tests are done too often, at least for some women (Stobbe, 1/18).

NPR's SHOTS blog: Many Older Women May Not Need Frequent Bone Scans
Dr. Margaret Gourlay of the University of North Carolina, who led the study, told Shots her team didn't expect older women with normal or near-normal bone density would take so long to develop osteoporosis. Of the 5,000 women in the study, half were in this low-risk group at the age of 67. Only 10 percent of them developed the disease over about 15 years (Knox, 1/18).

Meanwhile on another subject, federal officials have asked a court to reconsider a decision about compensating bone marrow donors.

Los Angeles Times: U.S. Asks Court To Reconsider Ruling On Bone Marrow Donations
A three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously on Dec. 1 that bone marrow filtered from a donor's blood was a blood part, not an organ part, and could be legally sold. But in a petition for rehearing by a full 11-judge panel of the court, Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder, Jr., said the three-judge panel had ignored the clear intent of Congress to prevent money from influencing donation decisions (Williams, 1/19).


http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Novel macrolide- DEL-1 axis helps in bone regeneration and new bone formation