Hawthorn and Cypress settle Medicaid fraud lawsuit

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Hawthorn Pharmaceuticals Inc. and its parent company, Cypress Pharmaceutical Inc., have paid the federal government and certain states a total of $2.8 million to settle a whistleblower lawsuit filed by Phillips & Cohen LLP that alleged Hawthorn falsely marketed unapproved prescription drugs as being eligible for reimbursement by Medicaid and other government health care programs.

An even bigger result of the "qui tam" (whistleblower) lawsuit -- which was filed "under seal" in 2007 in Plano, Texas, and made public today -- was that government health care programs stopped purchasing unapproved Hawthorn prescription drugs during the government investigation of the whistleblower's claims. Those drugs included cough and cold drugs, hydrocodone products and timed-release products using unapproved "tannate" formulations of drug ingredients.

The whistleblower, Robert Heiden, is a former district sales manager for Hawthorn in Florida. He is represented by Phillips & Cohen LLP.

ROBERT HEIDEN, THE WHISTLEBLOWER: "The impact of this case goes beyond the money recovered. Unapproved and unsafe drugs sold by Hawthorn and other companies have been pulled off Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement lists, protecting consumers and saving taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars."

"My case and the government's response mean that children, from infants to adolescents, now are protected from the dangers of certain drugs whose safety and effectiveness haven't been determined. With the removal of the drugs from government reimbursement lists, doctors are shielded from prescribing drugs they had been misled to believe were FDA-approved, and parents will no longer be giving their children drugs they didn't realize hadn't been approved by the FDA."

ATTORNEY COLETTE G. MATZZIE, PHILLIPS & COHEN LLP, WASHINGTON, DC: "A whistleblower lawsuit is a very effective enforcement tool for stopping sales of unapproved drugs. There are so many unapproved drugs that the FDA doesn't have the resources to stop sales of all of them. If the government cuts off Medicaid reimbursement for the unapproved drugs -- as it did with Hawthorn -- then the companies likely would no longer sell them as most of the market for the drugs would disappear."

ATTORNEY STEPHEN S. HASEGAWA, PHILLIPS & COHEN, SAN FRANCISCO: "It's appalling that a company would sell drugs for use by children, adolescents and others when those drugs hadn't been tested for safety or effectiveness. Doctors trusted that these drugs had been approved, not knowing Hawthorn knew how to work the system."

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Lurie Children's Hospital administers first gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy in Illinois