Viewpoints: Bill could make universal health care possible via states; The need to change how physicians are paid

Published on May 25, 2012 at 11:57 AM · No Comments

Los Angeles Times: Legislation May Enable States To Offer Universal Health Care
Universal coverage, Medicare for all, single payer -- call it what you will. It's clear that conservative forces are determined to prevent such a system from ever being introduced at the national level. So it's up to the states. The catch is that to make universal coverage work at the state level, you'd need some way to channel Medicare, Medicaid and other federal health care funds into the system. At the moment, that's difficult if not impossible. But legislation quietly being drafted by Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) would change that (David Lazarus, 5/25).

JAMA: Sustainable Health Care Reform Requires Changing How Physicians Are Paid
With the passage of the Affordable Care Act, renewed attention is being given to reforming how health care is organized and delivered. But there's another element needed for sustainable health care reform: finding ways to deal with unsustainable increases in health care spending. And that will require developing a more rational way to reimburse physicians (Gail Wilensky, 5/24).

Boston Globe: Health Care Will Test Gov. Patrick's Skills
The state's congenial, consensus-oriented CEO has become a successful, well-regarded governor in tough times. But though it's no doubt a delight to be Deval these days, the governor also faces a ticklish policy problem in the weeks ahead. That's health care cost containment, an issue that involves a sector vital to the state's economy, includes an array of powerful stakeholders and energized activists, and will play out during a national campaign, in which Republicans can be expected to saddle Barack Obama, Patrick's presidential pal, with anything Massachusetts Democrats do (Scot Lehigh, 5/25).

The Wall Street Journal: The Liberal Legal Meltdown Over ObamaCare
In apparent panic at the tenor of the Supreme Court argument over the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (aka ObamaCare), liberal law professors have exploded with anticipatory denunciations of the court's conservative justices -- claiming that it would be "hypocritical" and "partisan" of them to invalidate legislation passed by Congress when they generally oppose "judicial activism" (Michael McConnell, 5/24).

The Wall Street Journal: Prostate Testing And The Death Panel
It's hard to avoid a political aside, so I won't try. A healthy market-driven free economy leads to innovation and the development of breakthroughs, like the PSA test. A highly taxed and highly regulated economy leads to "Death Panels," like the U.S. Preventative Health Service (Tom Perkins, 5/23).

Forbes: Why Closing Medicare's 'Donut Hole' Is A Terrible Idea
Many conservatives believe that George W. Bush betrayed their cause. Exhibit A, these conservatives say, is the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003. That law established Medicare's prescription-drug benefit plan without offsetting spending cuts or tax increases, adding $16 trillion to our unfunded liabilities. And yet, if media reports are to be believed, some of these very same conservatives want to shower the program with even more taxpayer money, for no other reason than because it "polls well" (Avik Roy, 5/23).

The Washington Post: Sen. Tom Coburn, Part 2: Reforming Health Care
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) is a physician and the author of "The Debt Bomb: A Bold Plan to Stop Washington from Bankrupting America." This interview, which focuses on America's health care system, is the second in a two-part series. ... Coburn: And my point is the best care I give is when the patient is active and questioning what I'm doing. Don't question the doctor? We can't afford not to question doctors anymore. You need to know why you're getting a test, where you can get it cheaper, and what they can do about it. ... You have to invest some time. But you know how long it is before the average doctor interrupts the average patient for the first time? Seventeen seconds. Because we have a fixed-price system and they need to get to the next patient. So instead of me practicing the art and science of medicine, I'm practicing a scheduling-driven practice and ordering a bunch of tests to cover my rear end (Ezra Klein and Sen. Tom Coburn, 5/24).

The Washington Post: Kerrey's Case For Entitlement Reform
Speaking by phone from the campaign trail in Nebraska, [Democratic Senate candidate Bob] Kerrey rattles off the statistics on fewer workers supporting the benefits of a larger number of retirees as federal entitlement spending squeezes out every other public investment in the general welfare. ... The main obstacle to entitlement reform, he told me, is the "presupposition that people older than 65 can't take the truth. People are afraid of them. . . . We need to get people over 65 to look at people under 40, who, right now, are going to get screwed. They are going to get less than they were promised. We need to ask the grandparents, does that bother them?" Not as much as it should. But it bothers Kerrey (Michael Gerson, 5/24).

Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment