Primary health care for patients with urinary tract infections can save nearly $4 billion in ER visits

Published on May 7, 2013 at 9:15 AM · 1 Comment

Giving patients better access to primary health care could save nearly $4 billion a year in unnecessary emergency room visits for a single common complaint - urinary tract infections - according to a study by the Vattikuti Urology Institute at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit.

The study set out to determine the economic burden of 10.8 million patients, with a primary diagnosis of urinary tract infection, who went to U.S. emergency rooms for treatment from the beginning of 2006 to the end of 2009.

The findings will be presented May 6 at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association in San Diego.

"The cost of treating urinary tract infections in an outpatient clinic has already been estimated at under $200 per episode, including the office visit and lab fees," says Jesse D. Sammon, D.O., a researcher at Henry Ford's Vattikuti Urology Institute and lead author of the study. "In this study, we set out to compare that to the cost of treating this common disorder in hospital emergency departments.

"While most people would expect the cost to be higher in an emergency room, we found that it is much higher - more than 10 times the entire cost of treatment in an outpatient clinic."

The Henry Ford research team drew its study population from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, the largest all-payer database in the U.S., including statistics representing 20 percent of hospital-based emergency departments.

Of the 10,799,345 patients who were seen for urinary tract infections in emergency departments during the four-year study period, the vast majority - 9 million or 83.3 percent, between 2 million to 2.3 million per year - were treated and released, the researchers found.

Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski
Comments
  1. David Mountain David Mountain Australia says:

    The extraordinary thing about this study is it conflates "charges" with "costs". In the US of course what the opatient is/should be worried about is the outrageous charges they will incur for a UTI diagnosis and treatment. It costs nothing like $2000 to treat and manage a simple UTI. In Australia where I practice as an ED physician we have calculated the actual opportunity cost of a simple visit like this as being about $50-100 (that includes, lights, personnel time, dipstick urine etc e.g. additional costs to actually having an ED open) . On top of this would be faciltiy costs of about $50-100 as the cost of running/ building/ maintaining your facility which has to be there and open 24/7 anyway. Obviously if you are for profit as in US probably a mark up of 25% on costs would be reasonable- so it would cost 250-300$ even in a private system to treat a simple UTI. How on earth a UTI could cost $2000 to treat suggests outrageous overcharging, over servicing or possibly simple UTI patients are subsidising the care of sicker more complex patients. Whatever the reason charges described here bear no realtionship to the actual costs of delivering this sort of care.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment
Post