Recent Comments

Comment RSS

Medical advances abound while surgeons report concerns about medical errors

24. November 2009 10:54
The Wall Street Journal reports on "20 health-care advances to give thanks for this Thanksgiving." Among the most key: "Life expectancy in the U.S. reached an all-time high of 77.9 years in 2007, the latest year for which statistics are available, continuing a long upward trend. (That's 75.3 years for men and 80.4 years for women.) ... Death rates dropped significantly for eight of the 15 leading causes of death in the U.S., including cancer, heart disease, stroke, hypertension, accidents, diabetes, homicides and pneumonia, from 2006 to 2007."

The column notes, though, that setbacks have also occurred and "the gains haven't been universally shared. ...  Infant mortality remains high. Teen pregnancy is up. Obesity is rising. Organ transplants are down. The decline in cigarette smoking has stalled." But researchers are looking at the possibility of "personalized cancer medicines, promising drugs for lupus and Lou Gehrig's disease, gene therapy and cancer vaccines, and tests that may one day discern small deadly cancers from larger, slower ones" (Beck, 11/23).

Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal Health Blog reports that a survey to measure burnout and quality of life among surgeons found that 9 percent said "they were concerned they had made a 'major medical error' in the past three months." The paper, published by the Annals of Surgery, said surgeons do not appear to make more mistakes than other doctors but points out that "errors made by surgeons may have more severe consequences for patients due to the interventional nature of surgical practice. Those who said they had made an error also showed more signs of depression and emotional exhaustion, the authors found. ... Overall, 40% of those who responded were 'burned out,' according to the authors, and 30% showed symptoms of depression" (Goldstein, 11/23).

In a separate posting, The Health Blog reports that at a recent meeting the American Medical Association adopted a new policy opposing a recommendation from the Institute of Medicine to guarantee sleep time to medical residents. "Mandatory naps could 'have significant unintended consequences for continuity of patient care and safety, as well as being difficult and expensive to implement and monitor,' the AMA's recommendations say." The IOM in a report last year recommended that residents working shifts longer than 16 hours be given mandatory nap time. "Medical residencies, the clinical training docs do after finishing medical school, are famously intense. A few years back, in the face of arguments that exhausted residents are more likely to make mistakes, the group that oversees residency programs adopted work limits for residents" (Goldstein, 11/23).


http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article is republished with kind permission from our friends at The Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery of in-depth coverage of health policy developments, debates and discussions. The Daily Health Policy Report is published for Kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Copyright 2009 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.

Add comment



(Will show your Gravatar icon)
  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



News-Medical.Net provides this medical information service in accordance with these terms and conditions. Please note that medical information found on this website is designed to support, not to replace the relationship between patient and physician/doctor and the medical advice they may provide.