Opinions: Future of PEPFAR; family planning

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Washington Post Editorial Examines Future Of PEPFAR

A Washington Post editorial examines the future of PEPFAR under the Obama administration, as outlined in a five-year strategy released earlier this month. Though "[m]any organizations, including Doctors Without Borders, continue to worry that Mr. Obama is 'flat-lining' funding for the vital program," this "ignores Mr. Obama's move to make PEPFAR the center of a larger $63 billion global health initiative to develop more comprehensive and integrated approaches to care," the editorial writes. "To that end, PEPFAR 2 has three pillars: prevention, integration and improved health-care systems in the 15 participating countries..."

"Ultimately, the goal is to shift to a partnership, with the PEPFAR country taking ownership of the program's oversight. And the targets for PEPFAR 2 are ambitious," the editorial continues. "The financial resources are there to do it. What's needed is the active participation and leadership of PEPFAR countries to make it happen" (12/13).

Access To Family Planning Could Help Offset Carbon Emissions

In Copenhagen, "[c]ountries are wrangling over everything about human-induced climate change except the increasing number of humans inducing it," columnist Ellen Goodman writes in a Boston Globe opinion piece arguing that the U.N. climate change conference is overlooking family planning's potential role in mitigating the effects of climate change. She writes that "ever since the 1994 U.N. conference on population, international family planning policy has been focused on enabling women and men to make their own decisions. We've learned about the direct relationship between education and economic opportunities for women and smaller, later, healthier families."

"Today ... there are still hundreds of millions of married women who don't have access to services or information," Goodman writes. "There are nearly 7 billion people in the world today. Scientists project 9.5 billion people by 2050. In fact, there could be 8.5 billion or 10.5 billion. Depending on what we do." Goodman concludes: "What if we can lighten the burden on the planet while widening the chances for women? That's my kind of offset" (12/11).


Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Climate change heats up fungal threats worldwide