Liver cancer: Treatment with intra-arterial yttrium-90 microspheres promising

Published on March 17, 2010 at 7:29 AM · No Comments

More than three-fourths of hepatocellular carcinoma patients can't have surgery; intra-arterial yttrium-90 gives patients more time, offers minimally invasive treatment

An interventional radiology treatment-the use of intra-arterial yttrium-90 microspheres for liver cancer (also known as hepatocellular carcinoma)-shows promise in prolonging life for many patients with this devastating condition, according to researchers at the Society of Interventional Radiology's 35th Annual Scientific Meeting in Tampa, Fla.

"This is encouraging news for liver cancer patients, especially those who also have blockage in the portal vein. While patients aren't cured, their lives are being extended and their quality of life is improving with yttrium-90 microsphere treatment," said Riad Salem, M.D., MBA, director of interventional oncology at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago, Ill. "This unique interventional radiology treatment, which combines the radioactive isotope Y-90 into microspheres that deliver radiation directly to a tumor, is a particularly elegant way to give patients a cancer treatment that doesn't harm the healthy cells. Patients don't feel sick or have many of the side effects that happen with standard cancer treatments," added Salem, an interventional radiologist and professor of radiology, medicine and surgery at Northwestern University in Chicago, Ill. In a 291-patient study, patients with Child-Pugh A disease, with or without portal vein thrombosis (blood clot), benefited the most from Y-90 treatment, said Salem, with some patients surviving more than 20 months. Child-Pugh A patients with branch portal vein thrombosis survived nearly 17 months. "These are early promising results. This information can be used to design future Y-90 trials and to describe Y-90 as a potential treatment option to liver cancer patients," he added.

About 18,500 cases of primary liver cancer are diagnosed each year; the most common form is hepatocellular carcinoma, a tumor that begins in the main cells of the liver (hepatocytes). Primary liver cancer is twice as common in men as in women and occurs most frequently in those who have a form of liver disease called cirrhosis. Cirrhosis occurs when the liver becomes diseased and develops scarring, usually over a period of years. The liver attempts to repair or regenerate itself; this process can lead to the formation of tumors. In the United States, the most common causes of cirrhosis are alcohol abuse and chronic infection with the liver virus hepatitis B or C. Many patients with liver cancer have impaired liver function due to underlying cirrhosis and/or the tumors themselves. They are then at increased risk for liver toxicity from any liver cancer treatment. In the United States, approximately 50 percent of patients with primary liver cancer die of tumor progression and 40 percent die from advancing cirrhosis and subsequent liver failure.

Liver cancer treatment options are limited, said Salem. Although surgical removal of liver tumors offers the best chance for a cure, it is not possible for more than three-fourths of primary liver cancer patients. Liver tumors are often inoperable because the tumor may be too large or have grown into major blood vessels or other vital structures. Sometimes many small tumors are spread throughout the liver, making surgery too risky or impractical. Historically, chemotherapy drugs and external radiation therapy have been ineffective at curing inoperable liver cancer. Additionally, due to the compromised liver function of liver cancer patients, physicians must be careful that cancer treatments do not cause additional liver damage and toxicity, which could lead to death.

Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment