Drug company payments to doctors: Continuing controversy

NewsGuard 100/100 Score
The New York Times has two stories on pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians and experts.

In the first, the paper reports that the federal health care law will require drug companies and medical device makers to disclose payments made to doctors, starting in 2013. Some of the big drug makers already have released their databases, though "many followers of the pharmaceutical industry are still finding it far too difficult to follow the money. ... The money disclosed in such databases can be substantial. Pfizer, for instance, listed $35 million in payments to 4,500 doctors and 250 research organizations from June through December 2009." 

"Senate researchers have found that some prominent doctors at academic medical centers have failed to disclose millions of dollars in drug company payments, despite university requirements that they do so. ... Industry supporters, meanwhile, say they are trying to restore public trust, and they emphasize the importance of collaboration between pharmaceutical companies, academia and physicians to advance medicine" (Wilson, 4/12). 

The Times also reports that a "new analysis of reviews and articles about the controversial diabetes drug Avandia has found that experts who were paid by its manufacturer have been significantly more likely than others to draw positive conclusions about the drug's safety and efficacy."  

The study, which was published online in the journal BMJ, reviewed 202 articles about the drug Avandia, and the risk of heart attack associated with it. The study found that "often, authors with favorable opinions of the drug were paid both by Avandia's maker, GlaxoSmithKline, and by its competitors. Of those who offered favorable views, 87 percent had potential conflicts with Glaxo. Among authors who had unfavorable opinions, only 20 percent had received money from Glaxo." According to the authors the study was purely, "observational," and "drew no conclusions about the safety or efficacy of Avandia" (Bakalar, 4/12).

This is part of Kaiser Health News' Daily Report - a summary of health policy coverage from more than 300 news organizations. The full summary of the day's news can be found here and you can sign up for e-mail subscriptions to the Daily Report here. In addition, our staff of reporters and correspondents file original stories each day, which you can find on our home page.


Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
COVID-19 vaccines show moderate success in preventing long COVID in kids