Research roundup: Chronic disease interventions could save states money; Drilling into childhood cancer disparities; National heart emergency care system proposed

Published on May 5, 2012 at 12:55 AM · No Comments

Each week KHN reporter Christian Torres compiles a selection of recently released health policy studies and briefs.

Urban Institute: Potential Savings Through Prevention Of Avoidable Chronic Illness Among CalPERS State Active Members -- California is one of many states in financial crisis, and according to this report, it could save millions of dollars on state employee health benefits by preventing chronic disease. Researchers write that of analyzed the cost burden of chronic diseases among active employees who are part of the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) health program and found that of the "$1.6 billion spent
by CalPERS in 2008 on the health care services used by its State Active members, $362 million (22.4%)" was attributable to diabetes, hypertension, heart and kidney disease. They noted that with "well-designed and targeted interventions," the state could reduce disease prevalence by up to 15 percent and save as much as $54 million per year (Waidmann, Ormond and Spillman, 4/30).

Journal of Clinical Oncology: Treatment Outcomes In Black And White Children With Cancer: Results From the SEER Database and St Jude Children's Research Hospital, 1992 Through 2007 -- Cancer treatment outcomes are significantly worse for black children than white children. In this paper, national data were compared with outcomes at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital - which, the authors write, "provides comprehensive treatment to all patients regardless of their ability to pay." Discrepancies persisted nationwide in the most recent time period, but there was no significant difference between black and white children at St. Jude, regardless of cancer type. "The most straightforward explanation is that both groups receive the same effective risk-directed therapy and supportive care" at the children's hospital, researchers write (Pui et al., 4/30).

George Washington University: An Early Assessment Of The Potential Impact Of Texas' "Affiliation" Regulation On Access To Care For Low-income Women – Courts disputed this week whether Texas could exclude Planned Parenthood from the state Women's Health Program. This analysis describes how Planned Parenthood centers "are the main source of family planning, cancer screening, and preventive health care for women in the WHP." An estimated 52,000 low-income women could lose access to services if the centers were excluded, and while community health centers could be an alternative source of care, they "will have to overcome significant provider shortages and funding gaps to substantially expand access" (Shin, Sharac and Rosenbaum, 5/2).

Circulation: Has the Time Come For A National Cardiovascular Emergency Care System? -- Organizing medical care into regional systems with centers of expertise -- for example, hospital trauma centers -- can help improve outcomes and better pool resources. The authors cite a model in Minnesota and propose regionalizing care for cardiovascular emergencies. Such a system "has the potential to improve clinical outcomes; to provide ongoing education for patients, providers, and the community; and to serve as a foundation for cost-effective care through cardiovascular accountable care organizations," they write (Graham et al., 4/24).

Here is a selection of news coverage of other recent research:

MedPage Today: More Proof CMS Infection Pay Policy Works
Hospitals have become more focused on preventing infections since the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has stopped paying for those it deems preventable, a survey found. Of 317 infection control specialists surveyed, 81% reported increased attention to hospital-acquired infections as a result of the CMS rule, according to Grace Lee, MD, MPH, of Harvard Medical School, and colleagues. Whether that increased attention has led to fewer infections is unclear, the researchers wrote in the American Journal of Infection Control, but, in April 2010, a CDC report documented a 32% decrease in the incidence of bloodstream infections related to central line insertion in hospital patients (Walker, 5/3). 

Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment