Judge questions 'ripeness' of legal challenge to health law's contraception coverage mandate

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Meanwhile, two more Christian universities have brought lawsuits against this Obama administration policy.

Politico Pro: Judge Questions Wheaton Contraception Suit
U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Huvelle questioned Wheaton College closely Thursday as to whether its lawsuit against the administration's contraception coverage mandate is actually "ripe" for review. Wheaton, an evangelical Christian school in Illinois, opposes offering emergency contraception on religious grounds. On Aug. 1, the college asked Huvelle for a preliminary injunction against the Obama administration's contraception requirement under the health care law. But Huvelle, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton, said the administration's accommodation -- which is currently in a yearlong comment period -- may well solve the problem (Smith, 8/23).

The Hill: Evangelical Colleges Sue Over Birth Control Mandate
Two more Christian universities have filed suit against the Obama administration over a policy meant to ease women's access to free birth control. In their complaint, Indiana-based Grace College and Seminary and California-based Biola University argue that covering certain forms of birth control for employees without a co-pay amounts to "participating in" abortion. "The mandate imposes a substantial burden on the schools' religious exercise and coerces them to change or violate their religious beliefs," the document states (Viebeck, 8/23).

And Missouri presses on with a legal challenge to the Supreme Court's health law decision --

Politico Pro: Missouri Lawsuit Keeps Mandate Fight Alive
Opponents of the Affordable Care Act are pressing forward with a legal challenge they say could be the first to test the Supreme Court's decision earlier this summer to uphold President Barack Obama's health care law. Filed last year by Missouri's Republican lieutenant governor, Peter Kinder, the suit has been pending in the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, awaiting the high court's ruling. Earlier this month, it was updated to react to the ruling that upheld the law (Cheney, 8/24).


http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
At stake in mifepristone case: Abortion, FDA’s authority, and return to 1873 obscenity law