Collaborative Spine completes research agenda-setting process for spine care

NewsGuard 100/100 Score
The Collaborative Spine Research Foundation (Collaborative Spine) today announced it has completed the process of setting a research agenda for spine care. The agenda articulates the most critical clinical research issues that need to be addressed in order to deliver on the Foundation's commitment to advance the science and practice of the highest-quality spine care.  

Initiated July 2, 2012, the agenda-setting process was conducted through review of a comprehensive briefing document and completion of an online survey by which respondents recommended research topics. Through July and August, Collaborative Spine invited broad participation in the survey—inclusive of those who provide care, receive care, assist care teams or play a role in shaping access to care. At the close of the survey, on August 15, a total of 143 submissions had been received.

"Dialogue with stakeholders is central to the commitment that Collaborative Spine directors have explicitly made to one another and implicitly to our patients," said Collaborative Spine Board of Directors member Paul McCormick, MD, MPH, FAANS. "We look forward to continued conversation with individuals and organizations interested in better spine care through clinical research."

Review and deliberation of the recommended topics was led by the Foundation's 32-member Advisory Council whose members were recruited to represent clinical and academic medicine; the clinical spine research community; and industry, including medical technology, health services and insurance organizations. The Council met via webinar and presented their recommendations to the Collaborative Spine Board of Directors for its consideration.

"Through this process, stakeholders will shape the vast majority of the research funded by Collaborative Spine Research Foundation," said Board Chair James D. Heckman, MD. "We're very appreciative of each and every topic recommended." The Foundation's operating principles call for 80 percent of available funding to be devoted to agenda-directed research, with the remaining 20 percent put toward investigator-directed research.

Source: Collaborative Spine Research Foundation

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New research pinpoints key pathways in prostate cancer's vulnerability to ferroptosis