Though it was identified as a disorder as early as the 14th century, pica, or the eating of non-food items, has for years believed to be all but non-existent in a few corners of the globe - a 2006 study that reviewed research on pica found just four regions - the South of South America, Japan, Korea and Madagascar -where the behavior had never been observed.
A new Harvard study, however, is showing that pica - and particularly geophagy, or the eating of soil or clay, is far more prevalent in Madagascar, and may be more prevalent worldwide, than researchers previously thought.
As described in an October 17 paper published in PLoS ONE, Christopher Golden '05, a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard University Center for the Environment, and colleagues from Madagascar Health and Environmental Research, Universit- d'Antananarivo and Cornell University surveyed 760 people living in 16 villages in the northeastern corner of the island nation, and found that more than half had engaged in geophagy.
"We found the practice, though somewhat concealed, is incredibly widespread in Madagascar," Golden said. "Perhaps even more interesting, our findings suggest that the population that is engaging in this behavior doesn't fit with the traditional characterization of pica."
In earlier studies of pica, researchers found nearly all cases occurred in adolescents or pregnant women- periods of increased nutritional demands. As expected, Golden and colleagues found high rates of both pica and geophagy among women in Madagascar, but they were surprised to uncover equally high rates among men, and even observed cases of young children as young as five years old engaging in the behavior.
Among the men surveyed by the researchers, 63 percent admitted to geophagy, while 44 percent of children and a quarter of adolescent males also engaged in the practice. Though most often associated with pregnancy, the researchers also found that just over a quarter of non-pregnant women engaged in the behavior.
"We found no significant difference between men and women," Golden said. "That suggests that sex is unimportant to the behavior, and that's never been shown before. To be fair, it may simply be that the behavior hasn't been studied in men because earlier studies had focused on pregnant women, but it also suggests that we should be asking question about both sexes and across all ages to fully understand the motivations for this behavior."