Viewpoints: Krugman cautions against locking in benefit cuts that may not be necessary; Lift the freeze on CDC's gun research

Published on January 19, 2013 at 12:50 AM · No Comments

The New York Times: The Dwindling Deficit
Well, its probable (although not certain) that, within two or three decades, the Social Security trust fund will be exhausted, leaving the system unable to pay the full benefits specified by current law. So the plan is to avoid cuts in future benefits by committing right now to ... cuts in future benefits. Huh? O.K., you can argue that the adjustment to an aging population would be smoother if we commit to a glide path of benefit cuts now. On the other hand, by moving too soon we might lock in benefit cuts that turn out not to have been necessary. And much the same logic applies to Medicare. So there's a reasonable argument for leaving the question of how to deal with future problems up to future politicians (Paul Krugman, 1/17). 

The New York Times: The Next Four Years
Polarization is too deep. Special interests are too strong. The negotiators are too rusty. Republicans are not going to give up their vision of a low-tax America. Democrats are not willing to change the current entitlement programs. So as the president enters his second term, there has to be a new controlling narrative, a new strategy for how to spend the next four years (David Brooks, 1/17).

The New York Times: Room For Debate: Guns, Safety And Mental Health
In the days after 20 children and four adults were shot dead in a Connecticut school, calls by gun control opponents for a focus on mental health care were seen as a diversionary tactic to avoid legislation limiting America's arsenal. But elements of both President's Obama's proposals to address gun violence and new laws on the issue in New York deal with mental health care. Some are widely welcomed, some are more contentious. But can changes in the American mental health system reduce gun violence without creating more problems? (1/18).

Health Policy Solutions (a Colo. news service): Politics Stalls Research On Gun Violence Prevention
President Obama's package of initiatives and proposals includes a memorandum to lift the freeze on the CDC's gun violence research. The president asked Congress to appropriate $10 million to pay for it. But whether it's at the CDC or another organization, whether it's $1 million or $10 million, let's agree that we should gather information to be able to elevate our dialogue to a more productive level. In the name of all victims of shootings, that dialogue should include evidenced-based discourse on weapons availability, accessibility of mental health services, the influence of the entertainment industry and other topics deemed relevant by researchers (Amy Downs, 1/17).

Kansas City Star: To Improve Mental Health, We Must First Understand It
Here's a better idea for "arming" the nation's teachers. Let's do it with knowledge, support and resources about the mental health of children. The suggestion comes in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, from people who understand the importance of early detection and intervention. "Teachers must be taught how to identify troubled children early and to guide them into effective supports before these children get into difficulties," wrote Ron Manderscheid, executive director of the National Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disability Directors. Manderscheid's note is making the rounds among mental health professionals. Many are crafting similar messages to members of Congress (Mary Sanchez, 1/18).

Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment