Objections to sexual, reproductive rights language in CSW agreement are 'misguided'

Published on March 13, 2013 at 4:54 AM · No Comments

"[W]hile sitting through events, debates and discussions in New York [at the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) meeting], my recurring thought was why, in 2013, are we still arguing over whether women should have ownership of their own bodies?" Liz Ford, deputy editor of the Guardian's global development website, asks in the newspaper's "Poverty Matters Blog." "The mention of sexual and reproductive health and rights in the draft CSW agreement this year has become a major source of contention among negotiators -- much like it did at the Rio+20 summit last year," she writes, noting objections to the language from Pakistan, Iran, Malta and the Holy See, which holds permanent observer status at the U.N.

Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski
Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment
(optional)
Post