Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay study published in JCO

Published on July 2, 2013 at 9:09 AM · No Comments

NanoString Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: NSTG), a provider of life science tools for translational research and molecular diagnostic products, today announced that the TransATAC clinical validation study for its Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay, which is based on the PAM50 gene signature, was published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO). This study, portions of which were initially presented at the 2011 CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, evaluated the ability of three breast cancer tests to predict risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early-stage breast cancer. The authors of the study concluded that the PAM50-based assay provides more prognostic information in endocrine treated patients with HR+ node negative disease than Oncotype DX®, with better differentiation of intermediate and high-risk groups.

“The publication of the TransATAC study is an important milestone in our ongoing effort to enable genomic testing for breast cancer in local laboratories worldwide”

The study included 1,017 samples from the landmark ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial of postmenopausal women with HR+ early-stage breast cancer treated with five years of endocrine therapy. The study was performed on RNA extracted from tumor samples by Genomic Health, Inc. for validation of the Oncotype DX® Breast Cancer Assay. The goals of the TransATAC study were to determine if the PAM50 gene signature added prognostic information to clinical-pathological variables and to compare the performance of the PAM50 risk of recurrence (ROR) score, the Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS), and the IHC4 score, derived from immunohistochemical assessment of ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 genes, in indicating risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy. All primary and secondary endpoints of the study were met.

Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski
Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment
Post