Maternal and paternal age linked to child’s risk for developing autism or schizophrenia

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

A new study published in Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health indicates that parents who reproduce later in life are more likely to have children who develop autism disorders. Later reproduction was not, however, associated with increased risk for schizophrenia in offspring.

Multiple studies on this subject for over 30 years have found that risk patterns for these disorders are highly variable and often remain incomparable between public health studies due to substantial differences in study design. Now researchers from the Copenhagen Centre for Social Evolution have analyzed a massive single population sample from Denmark to compare risks based on maternal and paternal age, and parental age difference.

The authors used a sample of about 1.7 million Danish people born between January 1978 and January 2009, out of which approximately 6.5% were diagnosed with autistic or schizophrenic disorders during this time. Their data included the full spectrum of nation-wide autistic and schizophrenic diagnoses for up to 30 years of age and over twenty potentially confounding medical and socio-economic factors that they could statistically control for.

Unique personal identification numbers were used to link individuals' information between different Danish health registries, including the National Patient Registry (holding nationwide hospital admissions since 1977) and the Psychiatric Central Register (with diagnoses for all inpatient admissions since 1969). Combining these data sets also provided the ages of parents when children were born.

Above-average paternal and maternal ages were associated with increased risk of most autistic disorders in offspring and this effect was magnified in offspring of very old fathers. However, advanced maternal and paternal ages were not associated with higher risk of any schizophrenic disorder. In contrast, children of young parents had reduced risks of autism and only children of very young mothers had increased risks of schizophrenia.

More dissimilarly aged parents meant enhanced risk for both autistic and schizophrenic disorders in offspring compared to parents with similar ages at childbirth, but only up to a certain point where risks leveled out. For example, higher risk for autism in offspring of older fathers (or mothers) would tend to be compensated if they had a child with a much younger partner.

"The magnitude of these increases and decreases in statistical risk need to be scaled against the fortunately rather modest absolute risks of being diagnosed with a mental disorder in Denmark, which is 3.7% for all autistic disorders and 2.8% for all schizophrenic disorders up to 30 years of age. The highest increases and decreases that we could relate to paternal and maternal age added only 0.2-1.8% to these absolute risks, but represented changes in relative risk of 76-104%.", says Dr. Sean Byars, the first author of the study.

The study also discusses why these risk patterns continue to exist in modern humans and suggests that they are remnants of our evolutionary past. In an earlier study of the same population the authors showed that autism risks are associated with above average sizes at birth and schizophrenia risks with smaller (but) still normal sizes at birth. The authors highlight that modern families of 1-3 children now typically originate at ages that our ancestors were completing families of 6-8 children provided these children survived.

"Natural selection has shaped how parents, and particularly mothers, allocated their reproductive investments best in the face of uncertain conditions during our prehistory and well into modern historical times," said Professor Jacobus Boomsma, the senior author of the study. "It was not very long ago that most mothers had their first child around the age of 20 and went through 10 pregnancies. Our modern reproductive patterns are thus a poor match to what humans are likely to be naturally adapted to. Our evolutionary interpretations suggest how we can possibly understand recently increased mental disease risks that have no direct medical explanation."

Source: Oxford University Press USA

Comments

  1. Debbie Worley Debbie Worley United States says:

    Would be nice if it were true but it appears to be a direct contradiction of the people that I know with children that have on or the other. In all of those cases, the parents were early 20's.

  2. wandering wonder wandering wonder United States says:

    I have a friend diagnosed with schizophrenia. Her parents were 37 and 35 yrs of age when she was born.

  3. John Paterson John Paterson Australia says:

    How on earth is 3.7% a "fortunately rather modest absolute risk"??? Even in a small country like Denmark, that's hundreds of thousands of kids who's lives are destroyed. If there was some new virus that caused brain damage in 3.7% of kids there would be mass hysteria and billions would be spent on a desperate search for a solution. Imagine the reaction if all we did about this new virus was spend a pittance looking at the age of the parents? I really don't understand.

  4. Bicycle Girl Bicycle Girl United States says:

    Another good reason to outlaw women over 35 from having children and to ban artificial reproductive procedures.

  5. Peter Best Peter Best Canada says:

    studies over and over with one time this and another time something else and explaining the results in evolutionary terms. what would we do if we never had evolution for all of these explanations; and unfortunately; because of that evolutionary thing even ridiculously, in my opinion, applying to explanations of these studies; we are dumed i.e. finished as children continue to hallucinate and authorities ignore it when common sense will tell you that a child's neurons can not take that. What's in a neuron you may ask? Just a nerve cell waiting to be hardwired or if you want, you can also call it programming which as you know make you you and me me and why we were different. genes only made me better looking than you. My mind and brain made me less intelligent; but really it is no joking matter but after 10 years of research and no responses; I can only joke about it. That is facing reality until the authorities and people wake up to reality  and find out what is causing hallucinations in children if it is not obvious. It should be obvious. If I sound mad and bitter, it is because I am because children are getting these illnesses at such an alarming rate and we are talking about evolution and how we can't do anything about it and probably so because it is all about money and not children.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
NJHF awards $135K to Kessler Foundation scientists for pilot research projects