Michigan Judge rules against Blue Cross Blue Shield rate hikes, cites large surplus

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

A Michigan administrative law judge on Wednesday ruled that Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan would not be justified in increasing premiums by 24% to 42% for individual health insurance plans, the Detroit Free Press reports.

BCBS of Michigan, a not-for-profit company, is the state's insurer of last resort and must seek state approval for all premium rate increases. BCBS filed a petition in October 2006 to raise rates for seven of 12 individual policies, which would affect about 22,000 state residents, according to Joe Aoun, the attorney representing the Ann Arbor, Mich., couple who filed suit against the proposed rate increases in 2006.

In his ruling, Judge David Lick said the insurer's $2.4 billion in reserves is "very high by any standard" and "subscribers should receive the entire benefit of the power and the financial position" of BCBS. He also cited a 1980 state law governing BCBS that states the insurer's money and property "shall be acquired, held and disposed of only for the lawful purposes of the corporation and for the benefit of the subscribers of the corporation as a whole." The ruling also said that BCBS should use its earnings and surplus to help expand access to health care for the state's uninsured residents and Medicaid beneficiaries. In addition, Lick said BCBS' annual administrative cost growth should be reduced to 3% from the 5% the company estimated. BCBS also should not assess a 1% charge to individuals to subsidize supplemental Medicare and group conversion policies for people who previously had employer-sponsored health coverage, according to the ruling.

BCBS spokesperson Helen Stojic said the insurer is losing money on individual policies, adding, "This has gone on for longer than a year. No other insurance company has to go through this exceedingly long process to make their rates reflective of the medical costs of insurance." According to Stojic, BCBS' reserves are less than the maximum allowed by the state and are needed to handle potential emergencies. She added that Lick's ruling is "part of a bigger process" and "not a final judgment." Aoun said the ruling could have implications for businesses and the 4.6 million state residents with BCBS coverage.

The ruling must be approved by the Michigan Office of Financial and Insurance Regulations. BCBS and Aoun have 30 days to contact Lick with any concerns they have about the decision (Anstett, Detroit Free Press, 5/15).


Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Study reveals financial impact of cancer diagnosis on working-age adults in the U.S.