By Dr Ananya Mandal, MD
According to a recommendation by a federal advisory panel, before newborns leave the hospital, they should receive a simple, pain-free test to check for signs of congenital heart disease, one of the most common types of birth defects.
The report was published online this Sunday in the journal Pediatrics where doctors propose nationwide screening for critical congenital heart disease using pulse oximetry, a probe placed on a hand and a foot that uses a light source and sensor to measure oxygen in the blood. Low oxygen levels signal the need for further testing to look for a heart-related problem. New Jersey and Maryland recently passed laws requiring pulse oximetry screening, and similar bills are being considered in other states.
Congenital heart disease involves defects of the walls, valves, arteries or veins of the heart and occurs in seven to nine of every 1,000 live births in the United States. About a quarter of those babies have a critical illness, said Dr. Alex Kemper, an associate professor of pediatrics at Duke University and the lead author of the report. “Those defects are the ones that really require intervention early in life,” he explained. “The challenge is that a baby can be born with one of these heart defects and look totally normal in the nursery. But if you can fix these kids before they get really sick, they have better outcomes.”
“Over the last three decades, we've had incredible advances in treatment,” said Dr. Gerard Martin, co-director of the Children's National Heart Institute in Washington, which has pioneered the use of newborn pulse oximetry screening. “This is a disease we can do something about. The problem is not all babies are identified.” Studies show about 1 in 6 babies who die from critical congenital heart disease are undiagnosed, and unrecognized cases are thought to cause about 200 infant deaths each year, he said. An estimated 2,000 babies a year could be diagnosed sooner if pulse oximetry were routinely used.
The downside of pulse oximetry screening is that, while clearly useful in detecting the disease, it can also lead to false positive results that are costly and stressful for a family. However several large studies in Europe, including a study of more than 20,000 newborns in Britain published this month in the medical journal Lancet, showed that pulse oximetry had a high rate of detection when added to standard exams and a false positive rate of about 1 in 3,000 cases, Martin said.
“Hospitals that use pulse oximetry in addition to a physical exam can increase their detection of these babies tenfold,” Martin said. “There will be some babies potentially missed. But what the European studies showed is the babies who had false positives had other problems that required detection and treatment.”
“False positives are particularly bad because not all hospitals or nurseries will have access to pediatric echocardiograms or pediatric cardiologists,” Kemper said. “We want to minimize unnecessary tests.”