New method can determine seriousness of cancer prognosis with 80% certainty

Published on February 6, 2013 at 11:54 PM · 1 Comment

The number of incorrect cancer prognoses can be halved with computerised image analysis. In three years time, the method can be used on patients with bowel cancer, ovarian cancer and prostate cancer.

Today, too many cancer patients are over- or under-treated because the pathologists simply do not know enough. The prognostic certainty is only 60 per cent.

Pathologists, cell biologists and computer scientists at the University of Oslo have now developed a fully automated method that can determine the seriousness of a cancer prognosis with 80 per cent certainty. This means that the number of errors can be halved. In a few years, the method can be used in hospitals, initially with patients with bowel, ovarian or prostate cancer.

Cancer prognoses are currently made by studying tissue samples from the cancer in a microscope.

"Pathology is a vulnerable scientific part of medicine. When pathologists look at a section they must compare the results using their own memory. The results can vary from pathologist to pathologist. The results can also vary from the same pathologist between Monday and Friday. Though pathologists can diagnose cancer with 100 per cent certainty, the assessment of how serious the cancer is and how far it has advanced is very uncertain. There are no absolute 'yes' or 'no' answers. The answer determines whether the patient receives treatment A or B. Pathologists disagree because the methods are not good enough. Their analyses are based on their own best judgement", says Håvard Danielsen, Head of Research in the Institute for Medical Informatics at Radiumhospitalet and Professor at the University of Oslo, Norway. He is at the forefront worldwide in digital interpretations of pathological sections.

Together with Fritz Albregtsen in the Department of Informatics he has spent the past twenty years developing the new method, which makes it possible to increase the likelihood of a correct cancer prognosis by 33 per cent.

The two scientists point out that their method will not replace pathologists, but will be a tool that assists them.

On and off genes

Even if two patients receive the same risk assessment and the same treatment, one may die while the other gets well.

This has to do with epigenetics. Epigenetics is a modern science about the on and off buttons in genes.

"Previously, scientists said that mutations are important in cancer. Nevertheless, it is important to know which genes are turned on or off.

Genes in cancers are turned off and on differently than in healthy cells. Which genes are turned on and off can therefore be the difference between life and death.

"The instability in the genome has therefore become important in cancer research."

The answers are in the cemetery

The method is built on very sophisticated image analyses of all cancer sections from patients from the past twenty years, and combines the answers with what has happened to each patient.

"We gained access to a large archival material of pathological sections from 5,000 patients with colon and rectal cancer, for ten years from the time of their diagnosis. We picked out 300 patients, half of whom did well and half of whom did not."

Using sophisticated image analysis, they could see how the chromatin (the mixture of the DNA string and all the other proteins in the cell nucleus) were organised. They analysed up to 2,000 cell nuclei from the same patient.

Interprets gene clusters

The DNA string consists of more than 20,000 genes and is nearly two metres long. In order to fit the entire DNA string into a cell nucleus, which has a diameter of only six micrometres, parts of the genes must be packed tightly. Nature is so cleverly constructed that the genes that are tightly packed together are turned off.

The others are on. It is possible to colour the active genes with a special dye. The light sections are active genes, while the dark sections show the parts of the DNA string that are turned off.

Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski
Comments
  1. Michaeal Singer Michaeal Singer United States says:

    As patients present with multiple conditions and you are focused narrowly how do you account for the other conditions? A global noninvasive accurate method exist and its really time you learned more and used it. Perhaps in conjunction with the laser like focus you propose here but....

    Thank you,

    Cheers!

    Michaeal

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment
Post