Amgen’s AMG 416 Phase 3 placebo-controlled study meets primary and secondary endpoints

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Amgen (NASDAQ: AMGN) today announced that a second placebo-controlled Phase 3 study evaluating AMG 416 for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), receiving hemodialysis, met its primary and all secondary endpoints. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with > 30 percent reduction from baseline in parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels during an Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP) defined as the period between weeks 20 and 27. These results follow the recent announcement of positive data from a prior placebo-controlled Phase 3 study of AMG 416 which was similar in design and size.

In the AMG 416 group, 74.0 percent of patients achieved a > 30 percent reduction from baseline in PTH compared with 8.3 percent in the placebo arm, a statistically significant result. Secondary endpoints included the percent change from baseline during the EAP in serum phosphorus (P) concentration (mean changes of -7.71 and -1.31 percent among patients in the AMG 416 and placebo arms, respectively) and corrected calcium (cCa) concentration (mean changes of -7.29 and 1.18 percent among patients in the AMG 416 and placebo arms, respectively). Both of these secondary endpoint results were statistically significant. 

"The results from this second Phase 3 study help to confirm that AMG 416 could become an important new treatment option for dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism," said Sean E. Harper, M.D., executive vice president of Research and Development at Amgen. "Despite the variety of options available for the treatment of this disease, an unmet need remains for an intravenous therapy that can be administered along with hemodialysis. We look forward to sharing results of a head-to-head study evaluating AMG 416 compared to cinacalcet next year."

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 91.6 and 78.7 percent of patients who received AMG 416 and placebo, respectively. TEAEs that were reported in > 10 percent of patients who received AMG 416 included (AMG 416 vs. placebo, respectively): blood calcium decreased (61.0 and 8.3 percent), nausea (12.4 and 5.1 percent), muscle spasms (12.0 and 7.1 percent) and vomiting (10.4 and 7.1 percent). TEAEs of hypocalcemia (symptomatic) were reported in 7.2 percent of patients who received AMG 416 versus 0.4 percent in the placebo group. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 27.1 and 30.7 percent of patients who received AMG 416 and placebo, respectively.

Study Design
This was a 26-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (study number 20120229) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of AMG 416 for the treatment of SHPT in 508 patients with CKD receiving hemodialysis. Patients received AMG 416 or placebo three times per week by intravenous injection with each hemodialysis treatment. Doses ranged from a minimum of 2.5 mg to a maximum of 15 mg. Patients also received standard of care which could include calcium supplements, vitamin D sterols and phosphate binders, if prescribed by the individual physician.

Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with PTH ≤ 300 pg/mL during the EAP and the percent change from baseline during the EAP in values for PTH, serum cCa, corrected calcium-phosphorus product (cCa x P) and P.

 

Source:

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
To ban or not to ban, the case for reformulating ultra-processed foods