Habitual e-cigarette use may be linked to long-term cardiac risks, study finds

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

A study published in JAMA Cardiology has added to growing evidence that electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are not harmless.

"Studies like this give further confirmation that e-cigarettes are not harmless," said European Society of Cardiology cardiovascular prevention spokesperson Professor Joep Perk.

"If I was a minister of health I would put my efforts into public anti-smoking campaigns especially directed towards the younger generation, and not promote e-cigarettes as an alternative to smoking," he continued. "There are studies also showing that people that start with e-cigarettes have a tendency to become persistent tobacco cigarette smokers as well."

The 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention flagged up the need for further research on the long-term effects of e-cigarettes.

The current study included 23 habitual e-cigarette users (used most days for at least one year) and 19 non-users between the ages of 21 and 45 years. It found that habitual e-cigarette users were more likely than non-users to have increased cardiac sympathetic activity (increased adrenaline levels in the heart) and increased oxidative stress - known mechanisms by which tobacco cigarettes increase cardiovascular risk.

The authors said the findings "have critical implications for the long-term cardiac risks associated with habitual e-cigarette use" and "mandate a re-examination of aerosolized nicotine and its metabolites". They added that causality could not be confirmed on the basis of this single, small study, and that further research into the potential adverse cardiovascular health effects of e-cigarettes is warranted.

"Nicotine stimulates the central nervous system, so it's not at all surprising that people continuously taking nicotine get this sympathetic stimulation," said Professor Perk. "This then might lead to irregular heartbeat and raised blood pressure, and probably has long-term deleterious effects on the blood vessel walls."

"It is too large a step to say that these negative effects are proof that people are going to die early because they used e-cigarettes," he continued. "To prove this you have to put people on e-cigarettes for 10 to 15 years and see how many die early - a study that will not be done for ethical reasons. The weakness of all studies in this field is that they are observational and small, and they look at indicators of vascular wall damage rather than incidence of cardiovascular disease or death."

Professor Perk said that, even after this study, e-cigarettes could still be used to help people stop smoking tobacco cigarettes, but they should be used with caution and other methods should preferably be tried first.

He said: "E-cigarettes are one of the tools we have in nicotine replacement therapy but as clinicians we should be cautious of putting people on large amounts of central nervous system stimulant drugs. Other smoking cessation schemes, such as chewing gum or patches, always include the decision to taper off use and eventually stop. This is not in general the case with e-cigarettes, which tend to be seen as a replacement and not a weaning off nicotine addiction. In fact they prolong the addiction."

"This is an area where we need more knowledge," continued Professor Perk. "The more data we collect, the more it seems that nicotine replacement strategies that taper off and ultimately end nicotine use are the way to go."

"At the end of the day the best thing is simply to prevent people ever getting into the vicinity of nicotine," he concluded.

Source: European Society of Cardiology

Comments

  1. Danny Valdez Danny Valdez United States says:

    They can't do a study like this cus the e-cigarette have not been out that long and no one has ever died from e-cigarette  the people that are saying this are getting  paid from the big tobacco company  cus there loosing  alot of money

  2. Mike Schoonover Mike Schoonover United States says:

    Nicotine's affect on the cardiovascular system is tempory and has not been considered a serious health risk since the Surgeon generals 1964 Report on Smoking states as much.
    "page 41
    The habitual use of tobacco is related primarily to psychological and
    social drives, reinforced and perpetuated by the pharmacological actions
    of nicotine.
    Social stimulation appears to play a major role in a young person’s early
    and first experiments with smoking. No scientific evidence supports the
    popular hypothesis that smoking among adolescents is an expression
    rebellion against authority. Individual stress appears to be associated more
    with fluctuations in the amount of smoking than with the prevalence of smoking.
    The overwhelming evidence indicates that smoking-its beginning,
    habituation, and occasional discontinuation-is to a very large extent psychologically
    and socially determined.
    Nicotine is rapidly changed in the body to relatively inactive substances
    with low toxicity. The chronic toxicity of small doses of nicotine is low
    in experimental animals. These two facts, when taken in conjunction with
    the low mortality ratios of pipe and cigar smokers, indicate that the chronic
    toxicity of nicotine in quantities absorbed from smoking and other methods
    of tobacco use is very low and probably does not represent an important
    health hazard. "
    http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/access/nnbbmq.pdf

  3. Glen Appleton Glen Appleton United States says:

    To add some context: There was a review of a study very similar to this one last year that the cardiovascular stress levels achieved when using nicotine (a mild stimulant) were the within the range of other activities such as consuming a caffeinated beverage; moderate exercise; watching an action / horror movie; listening to certain types of music (rock / metal, for instance); etc. In short, this "study" and the press release parroted by the corporate media provides no information that could not otherwise be deduced with some critical thinking.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New research pinpoints key pathways in prostate cancer's vulnerability to ferroptosis