Protection afforded by SARS-CoV-2 infection against reinfection when Omicron BA.5 was the dominating subvariant in Scania county, Sweden

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

In a recent study posted to the medRxiv* preprint server, researchers from Sweden conducted a cohort study to evaluate the protection granted by previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariant infections against reinfections among individuals vaccinated between June and August 2022.

Study: Protection against infection with the Omicron BA.5 subvariant among people with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection - surveillance results from southern Sweden, June to August 2022. Image Credit: Mahir KART/Shutterstock
Study: Protection against infection with the Omicron BA.5 subvariant among people with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection - surveillance results from southern Sweden, June to August 2022. Image Credit: Mahir KART/Shutterstock

*Important notice: medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

Background

With large portions of the global population vaccinated with the primary two doses of one of the many available vaccines, the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and associated mortality has decreased significantly. However, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants carrying mutations that increase their transmissibility and immune evasion abilities have replaced earlier variants in circulation. The Omicron BA.5 subvariant has replaced the BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants in many countries.

Furthermore, studies from various countries report that hybrid immunity from vaccinations and previous SARS-CoV-2 infections protect against infections from the BA.5 subvariant. A Portuguese study reported that previous BA.1 and BA.2 infections granted 75% protection against BA.5 infections. In comparison, a study from Denmark reported over 90% protection from BA.1 and BA.2 infections among vaccinated individuals against BA.5 infections, albeit with no assessment of waning immunity.

About the study

In the present study, the researchers included individuals between the ages of 18 and 64, residing in Scania county in southern Sweden, who had received their first vaccination dose on or before 24 April 2021. Since healthcare workers were prioritized for the early vaccination program, the authors expected the study cohort to comprise mainly healthcare workers. The longitudinal study followed up with the participants until 9 August 2022 for positive SARS-CoV-2 tests.

The follow-up period was divided into seven groups based on the sequencing results from infected case samples. The follow up-period divisions included the time before the emergence of the Omicron variant, the transition phase for Omicron dominance, the dominance period of the BA.1 sub-variant, the transition phase for Omicron BA.2, the dominance period of BA.2, transition to BA.5, and period of BA.5 dominance.

Vaccination status data from the National Vaccination Register, positive SARS-CoV-2 test results from regional health registers, and data on comorbidities and COVID-19 outcomes were statistically analyzed. Assessed comorbidities included cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, kidney and liver diseases, obesity, cancer and related immunosuppressed conditions, neurological diseases, other respiratory diseases, Down syndrome, sickle cell anemia, human immunodeficiency virus infections, thalassemia, and other conditions such as drug addiction and mental health disorders.

Additionally, a 1:10 sex and age-matched control group with no positive SARS-CoV-2 tests during the same weeks as the infected cases was also included in the analysis. The protection against Omicron BA.5 infection was estimated using conditional logistic regression according to the time of the most recent SARS-CoV-2 infection, adjusted for the vaccine doses.

Results

The results reported that previous SARS-CoV-2 infections with variants before Omicron provided reduced protection (11%) against reinfections. In comparison, previous Omicron subvariant infections provided significantly greater protection (66%) against reinfections with Omicron BA.5. The hospitalization risk during BA.5 dominance was relatively low (1.6%), although higher than that during the dominance of the BA.1 subvariant (0.5%).

Previous infections with the Omicron BA.2 sub-variant granted stronger protection (77%) against reinfections with BA.5 than previous BA.1 infections (30%). Furthermore, prior infection with Omicron BA.2 provided 85% and 66% protection against reinfections during early and late BA.5 dominance periods, respectively.

The study analyzed 1,114 COVID-19 reinfection cases, matched with 11,140 controls. The test and control groups were similar in demographic, socioeconomic factors, and comorbidities. Surprisingly, booster vaccinations were seen to have no significant effect on protection against reinfections, with a larger number of individuals with booster vaccinations present in the test group than in the control group.

Conclusions

Overall, the results indicated that compared to previous infections from SARS-CoV-2 variants before Omicron, prior Omicron subvariant infections, especially BA.2 infections, granted significantly higher protection against reinfections during the dominance period of the Omicron BA.5 subvariant.

Additionally, booster vaccine doses did not result in a significant change in protection against reinfections, indicating that natural Omicron sub-variant infections granted better short-term protection against reinfections during the Omicron BA.5 dominance period than booster vaccines did. However, the protection provided by previous Omicron infections was seen to wane five to six months after the infection.

*Important notice: medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

Journal reference:
Dr. Chinta Sidharthan

Written by

Dr. Chinta Sidharthan

Chinta Sidharthan is a writer based in Bangalore, India. Her academic background is in evolutionary biology and genetics, and she has extensive experience in scientific research, teaching, science writing, and herpetology. Chinta holds a Ph.D. in evolutionary biology from the Indian Institute of Science and is passionate about science education, writing, animals, wildlife, and conservation. For her doctoral research, she explored the origins and diversification of blindsnakes in India, as a part of which she did extensive fieldwork in the jungles of southern India. She has received the Canadian Governor General’s bronze medal and Bangalore University gold medal for academic excellence and published her research in high-impact journals.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Sidharthan, Chinta. (2022, December 15). Protection afforded by SARS-CoV-2 infection against reinfection when Omicron BA.5 was the dominating subvariant in Scania county, Sweden. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 29, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20221117/Protection-afforded-by-SARS-CoV-2-infection-against-reinfection-when-Omicron-BA5-was-the-dominating-subvariant-in-Scania-county-Sweden.aspx.

  • MLA

    Sidharthan, Chinta. "Protection afforded by SARS-CoV-2 infection against reinfection when Omicron BA.5 was the dominating subvariant in Scania county, Sweden". News-Medical. 29 April 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20221117/Protection-afforded-by-SARS-CoV-2-infection-against-reinfection-when-Omicron-BA5-was-the-dominating-subvariant-in-Scania-county-Sweden.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Sidharthan, Chinta. "Protection afforded by SARS-CoV-2 infection against reinfection when Omicron BA.5 was the dominating subvariant in Scania county, Sweden". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20221117/Protection-afforded-by-SARS-CoV-2-infection-against-reinfection-when-Omicron-BA5-was-the-dominating-subvariant-in-Scania-county-Sweden.aspx. (accessed April 29, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Sidharthan, Chinta. 2022. Protection afforded by SARS-CoV-2 infection against reinfection when Omicron BA.5 was the dominating subvariant in Scania county, Sweden. News-Medical, viewed 29 April 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20221117/Protection-afforded-by-SARS-CoV-2-infection-against-reinfection-when-Omicron-BA5-was-the-dominating-subvariant-in-Scania-county-Sweden.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Research confirms no association between SARS-CoV-2 and childhood asthma diagnoses