A further analysis of a previously published National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) funded study of children with mild persistent asthma reports the relative benefits of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment varies among children with differing demographic and clinical characteristics.
"We performed post-hoc data analysis on 288 children enrolled in the TReating Children to Prevent Exacerbations of Asthma (TREXA) study performed by the NHLBI funded Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network," said Lynn Gerald, PhD, MSPH, professor in the Department of Health Promotion Sciences and associate dean of research in the College of Public Health at the University of Arizona. "Our findings suggest that all children with mild persistent asthma benefit from ICS treatment, but some groups benefit more than others."
The TREXA trial compared four ICS treatment strategies: daily treatment (daily), daily treatment plus symptom-targeted treatment (combined), symptom-targeted only treatment (rescue), and placebo. Daily treatment, but not combined or rescue treatment, reduced the time to first exacerbation compared with placebo, and all three strategies reduced treatment failures. Time to treatment failure was defined as time to an oral corticosteroid-requiring exacerbation and treatment failure was defined as experiencing two or more oral corticosteroid-requiring exacerbations.