Bowel cancer and GIST patients could benefit from novel oral drug

Published on November 22, 2012 at 11:19 AM · No Comments

Two phase 3 trials, published in The Lancet, have shown that a novel oral drug called regorafenib could offer survival benefits to people with bowel (colorectal) cancer or gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) following failure of existing treatments.

Globally, nearly 1.25 million people are diagnosed with bowel cancer every year, and in at least 50% of patients the cancer spreads to other parts of their body (which doctors refer to as the cancer becoming metastatic).  Metastatic bowel cancer tends not to be treatable by surgery, and although there are a number of existing drugs which can be used to treat the cancer, resistance develops eventually to all therapies, and patients then have poor prognosis.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) belong to a type of cancer known as soft tissue sarcomas, and although they are relatively rare, there are thought to be at least 8000 new cases in Europe every year.  While GISTs can be surgically removed in their early stages, more than 40% of cases recur and begin to spread.  There are currently only two drugs – ‘molecular targeted’ therapies called imatinib and sunitinib – approved to treat GISTs.

In one trial, led by Professor Eric Van Cutsem, at the University Hospitals Leuven in Belgium, and Professor Axel Grothey at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, researchers assessed the effect of regorafenib on patients with bowel cancer which was progressing after the patients had received all available standard therapies (classic chemotherapy, and other targeted agents).  In a group of 760 patients, 505 were assigned a daily 160mg dose of regorafenib for three weeks, followed by a one week break, and 255 patients were assigned a placebo delivered to the same schedule.  The cycle was then repeated if necessary.  All patients received the best available supportive care throughout the trial.

The trial participants were monitored for up to 16 months after the trial began, and the researchers found that overall, patients who received regorafenib had an overall survival of an average (median) of 6.4 months, compared to 5.0 months for those who were given placebo.  The authors noted also that regorafenib delayed progression compared to placebo, and more frequently controlled metastatic disease compared to placebo. 

According to Professor Van Cutsem, “Our results show that in patients with progressive bowel cancer which still progresses after standard treatments, regorafenib can significantly prolong survival, compared with placebo. This provides further evidence for the role of targeted therapies, and should offer hope for a new standard of care in bowel cancer patients who have no other treatment options left to them.  In future, we hope to find subgroups of patients, based on molecular markers, who may experience significantly better survival times on regorafenib and are likely to benefit from it the most.”

In another trial, researchers led by Professor George Demetri, at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School in Boston, USA, examined the effect that regorafenib had on patients with GIST which was worsening, despite prior treatment with both imanitib and sunitinib.  In a group of 199 patients, 133 received a daily 160mg dose of regorafenib for three weeks, followed by a one week break, and 66 patients received a matching placebo delivered to the same schedule, with the cycle of treatment repeated as long as benefit was maintained.  Again, all patients received the best available supportive care throughout the trial.  Trial participants were monitored for at least 12 months after the trial began, and those patients who started by receiving regorafenib had an average (median) progression-free surivival time of 4.8 months, compared to 0.9 months to those in the matched placebo group.

Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment