Baby's first words most likely to depend upon visual experience, IU research finds

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Indiana University psychologists have shown that a baby's most likely first words are based upon their visual experience, laying the foundation for a new theory of infant language learning.

The findings also suggest new possibilities for the treatment of children with language deficits and autism.

Drawing on theories of statistical learning, IU researcher Linda Smith and colleagues found that the number of times an object enters an infant's field of vision "tips the scales" in favor of associating certain words with certain objects.

The research appears in the journal of the Royal Society Philosophical Transactions B in a special issue on statistical learning.

"We think that children's first words are predictable based on their visual experience with objects and the prevalence of those objects in their visual world," said Smith, a professor in the IU Bloomington College of Arts and Sciences' Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and senior author on the study.

"Visual memory may be the initial key to getting words stuck on objects -- familiar visual objects like table, shirt, bottle or spoon," she added. "It's an aggregated experience; those very first words may be learned -- slowly and incrementally -- for a few visually pervasive objects. This may be how infants begin to break into language before their first birthday."

The study's results could also help inform interventions for children with delayed speech and other language disorders.

"Difficulty learning words could stem from visual processing problems," Smith added. "Children who are late talkers have slow or age-delayed visual processing skills for objects, for example. Children with autism have object-processing problems as well."

Although many researchers have studied infants' first words to understand learning, Smith said none have approached the question from the visual side.

"While studying language acquisition from the 'word side' may benefit those studying later stages of language learning -- at the ages of 18 months to 3 years -- it cannot account for how children break into language," she said.

Under the new theory, which Smith and colleagues call the Pervasiveness Hypothesis, a few highly prevalent objects stand out to infants among the "clutter" of other less frequent objects to become their first words.

To conduct their study, IU researchers looked at videos that showed the visual field of eight children -- five girls and three boys -- between 8 and 10 months old, the period before children engage in verbal interactions with parents and caregivers.

The videos came from head-mounted cameras worn by the children an average of 4.4 hours. Caregivers were told the cameras would observe children's daily activities, not words or objects specifically. Caregivers could choose when to activate the camera.

For the purpose of the study, researchers observed mealtime scenes, defined as any eating by anyone at any time or location -- in cars, at playtime or in a high chair, for example. The recordings yielded 917,207 mealtime frames, with one image sampled every five seconds. Five objects were recorded for each frame: a total of 745 objects.

Using an accepted method to index child vocabulary, the researchers then divided the named objects into "first nouns," which are acquired by half of all 16-month-olds; "early nouns," which are known by half of all 30-month-olds; and "late nouns," which are acquired at later stages of learning.

First nouns include words such as table, shirt, chair, bowl, cup, bottle, food, spoon and plate.

The study's results revealed a strong correlation between the most frequently appearing objects and "first nouns," with the top 15 of these words appearing in the images collected by the study.

"The comparison of first and early nouns was particularly striking, since both sets of object names are acquired quite early in childhood and refer to objects common in households with infants," said Elizabeth Clerkin, a Ph.D. student in the IU Bloomington Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and first author on the study.

"That infants' visual environment during mealtime consistently involves a very small number of objects -- and the names of these high-frequency objects are among those normally learned first by infants -- suggests visual experience is doing the heavy lifting in very early word learning," she added.

Whether children who experience speech disorders are not picking up visual regularities in the environment or simply live in households with fewer regularities, Smith said it's vital to explore the role of both words and vision in language learning.

"Taking account of the visual brings a whole new dimension of word-learning into view," she added. "If all you ever worry about is the word side of word-learning, you may be missing half the problem: visual cues that aid language learning."

Comments

  1. Peter Best Peter Best Canada says:

    I have some concerns on this study. I have no doubt that what they say is true but I would be very concerns with experimenting with visual techniques on these types of things especially with infants and young children because the way things are and always has been is that the baby first words are Mom Dad and other members of the family and that is the way it should be because mind development is and should be on psychological development via of family. Family is everything to the child and development is via interaction with the family; and according to my theories, objects are simply semiconscious development and they should not be promoted until at least psychological development is well established; because they will come naturally anyway as the child starts to communicate with the members of his/her family as he will imitate, copy and incorporate what ever they are doing and saying etc. My research is in free iBooks but it has never been confirmed and or even officially reviewed by others; and I am not a qualified scientist although I do have course and I do enjoy research although I never really meant to do any on mind and brain development except I though Autism was caused by the distorting types of hallucinations; and I could not find anyone to do the research and or even consider it.

    Now, I am sure; and in fact; it may be due to the semiconscious development of movement into items that do not move and or just simply too much semiconscious development  of objects (informational overload and or object overload) sin the objects mentioned in this article and that is why I have some serious concerns on promoting the visual learning of these types of objects. It may interfere with psychological development via of the parents; and in fact everything comes from the parents including the learning of these words but first a firm connection and bonding with the parent should be well established and then the rest will come in due time naturally. I would even cautious about Windows of Opportunities  that involve these things.

    Anything that anyone can discover about mind and brain development is fine but when it comes to infants and young children with their undeveloped mind and brain; we need to be sure about what we do with early development; and not overload it or semiconsciously develop movement into things that normally do not move. TV and or spinning fans for example have concepts of movement and repetitious sounds or flashing lights may maybe impart concepts and or images of movement in objects that usually do not move; and that in itself could cause hallucination ,maybe and of course there are many other causes. Something is doing it as hallucinations are the only things that could cause SASd, etc. and thus SIDs also as that is along the time line and then we have the usual mental illnesses and dementias all cause by chronic and or traumatic events, abuse etc.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New research pinpoints key pathways in prostate cancer's vulnerability to ferroptosis