Clinical trials show benefits of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic strokes

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Anthony J. Furlan, MD, Chairman of Neurology and Co-Director of the Neurological Institute at University Hospitals (UH) Case Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, who writes an accompanying editorial for five studies about endovascular stroke therapy published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM.org">NEJM.org April 17), says these randomized clinical trials represent a breakthrough in showing the benefits of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic strokes.

"Now even endovascular skeptics will be convinced," Dr. Furlan writes.

His editorial, entitled Endovascular Stroke Therapy: It's About Time, states that these trials demonstrate the therapy is highly beneficial in a "resounding fashion."

The studies compared endovascular therapy - administration of an intravenous clot-busting agent (tPA) followed by device removal of a clot blocking a brain artery - with the clot-busting agent IV tPA alone for the treatment of ischemic stroke.

Dr. Furlan says that these new studies should settle any lingering uncertainties that have existed over endovascular therapy (also known as intra-arterial therapy), especially since three studies in 2013 indicated the therapy was no more effective than IV tPA alone.

He attributes the difference in results in the new studies to three things: Superior surgical technology resulting in faster, more complete clearage of the blockage; heightened awareness of decreasing the amount of time between patient arrival in the emergency department to the start of the endovascular procedure, and improved neuroimaging criteria for selecting patients most likely to benefit from the therapy.

Dr. Furlan says these studies represent a paradigm shift reminiscent of the introduction of the clot-busting therapy IV tPA in the 1990s.

"However, a major difference between then and now is that a stroke infrastructure is already in place in many countries due to the introduction of tPA during the past 20 years. Now, our stroke systems must adapt to endovascular therapy."

As with tPA, only a small percentage of stroke victims will need endovascular therapy (about 10 percent), according to Dr. Furlan, and not every hospital can or should perform it. Every year, more than 795,000 people in the United States have a stroke, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

"This therapy will have major implications for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) triaging decisions because endovascular candidates should now be directly transported to a Comprehensive Stroke Center whenever possible, as rapidly as possible."

"As a result of these studies, the real winners are our patients with devastating strokes," Dr. Furlan says.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Study reveals long-term consequences of atrial fibrillation