1. Audrey Silk Audrey Silk United States says:

    Oh please.  This is what passes for science? A tiny 282 baby sample who are 2 to 3 days olds?? It's so blatantly clear that the cavalcade of so-called studies on so-called "secondhand smoke" is smoke of its own kind. What other issue rolls out -- like a conveyor belt -- new "studies" every day? All manufactured to find the next way to  coerce behavior through fear-mongering.  Each new "study" is like plugging any holes where there might still be some leaks (people still smoking).  We've gone from the ridiculous to the ludicrous.  The entire field of science suffers when it's prostituted for an agenda:  SmokER-free society.  Who is to believe anything anyone in the medical profession says anymore.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.