Supreme Court declines to expedite Virginia suit against health law

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Virginia's challenge of the health law will need to take the normal route through federal appeals courts.

The Associated Press:  Supreme Court Rejects Call To Put Review Of Health Care Law On Fast Track
The Supreme Court has rejected a call from Virginia's attorney general to depart from its usual practice and put review of the health care law on a fast track. Instead, judicial review of President Barack Obama's signature legislation will continue in federal appeals courts (4/25).

Reuters: Supreme Court Won't Speed Up Obama Healthcare Law Ruling
The justices turned down the state of Virginia's request to invoke a rarely used procedure to bypass the normal appeals process and speed up a Supreme Court ruling on the law's constitutionality ... Several federal trial judges around the nation have upheld the law but others have declared it unconstitutional (Vicini, 4/25).

The Wall Street Journal: High Court Rejects Early Challenge of Health Law
The move, which came in a short written order, wasn't a surprise because the court rarely agrees to hear cases before lower appeals courts have a chance to rule first. Mr. Cuccinelli argued that prompt Supreme Court resolution of the law's constitutionality was in the public's best interest. Mr. Cuccinelli challenged the health-care overhaul the day President Barack Obama signed it into law (Kendall, 4/25).

The Washington Post: Supreme Court Turns Down Virginia's Request To Expediate Review Of Health-Care Law
Depending on the speed of the appeals courts and the legal process, the issue could arrive back at the court by next year, in the thick of the next presidential election. ... [Cuccinelli] challenged Congress' authority to pass the so-called individual mandate, which requires nearly all Americans either be covered by their employer's insurance or buy their own coverage. ... But the Obama administration countered that the individual mandate requirement does not take effect until 2014, and that the justices would benefit from reviews of the law now underway in the appellate courts (Barnes, 4/25).

Related from KHN: Scoreboard: Tracking Health Law Court Challenges (Vaida, 4/25)


http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Effects of varying COVID-19 vaccination rates on population-level health outcomes across variant waves in the U.S.