Recurrent Miscarriage Epidemiology

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) has various definitions, but most specialists would define it as the loss of 3 or more clinically confirmed pregnancies. This criterion has been fixed on the basis of epidemiological studies.

Credit: Piotr Adamowicz/

RPL itself is subdivided into primary and secondary types, depending on whether the woman has never carried a successful pregnancy or has had one successful pregnancy succeeded by consecutive miscarriages. It is seen to affect about 1 in 100 women of reproductive age, but the reported incidence varies between 0.4 to 3%. Of this 1%, about a third is attributable to chance alone.

According to the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, RPL is diagnosed as two or more miscarriages, and the risk increases after each loss. The true incidence is harder to find because of the impact of age, definition of pregnancy loss (biochemical versus clinical pregnancy).

Causes and classification

Identified causes consisted chiefly of anomalies of the uterus, chromosomal defects, and endocrine defects, including polycystic ovarian syndrome. In more than 50% no reason was detected.

Other studies show that it is possible that much RPL is the product of chance, but a small percentage is actually associated with definite pathology. This has led to another type of classification for unexplained RPL, namely:

Type I

This refers to unexplained RPL occurring purely by chance and with a good pregnancy outcome to be expected in future.

These women are usually older. Women who are between 40–44 are a hundred times at risk of RPL (13.3%) due to chance alone, in comparison with those aged 20–24 years (0.13%). The miscarriages involve mostly or only biochemical (very early) pregnancies (when the pregnancy test is positive, but no clinical confirmation of pregnancy was achieved before the miscarriage).

Biochemical pregnancy loss is very common, occurring in 6 of 10 early pregnancies in the general population. About one in five women can, therefore, have three or more biochemical pregnancy losses just by chance.

In these cases, the karyotypes of aborted fetuses are likely to be abnormal in at least half the cases, and three losses are likely.

Type II

This refers to unexplained RPL associated with an unidentified but existing pathology and which has therefore a worse expected prognosis.

Such women are typically below 30 years. They have had four or more miscarriages with normal karyotypes. The fetal heartbeat, which normally signifies a very low risk of miscarriage, was detected prior to the loss.

Diagnostic difficulties

Defining the criteria for RPL is important because biochemical pregnancies are often lost unlike clinical pregnancies. Additionally, women with a history of previous miscarriage are likely to be monitored more closely so that pregnancy is detected in the biochemical stage itself, unlike other pregnant women who are diagnosed only after clinical pregnancy begins.

For instance, a woman with two or more previous losses would have serum beta-HCG levels measured quite early, enabling even biochemical pregnancies to be identified and their loss to be detected. This causes a higher rate of pregnancy loss to be calculated in this subpopulation, compared with women in the general population, in whom a miscarriage is identified only after a clinical pregnancy is first confirmed.

Thus, the reported incidence of spontaneous abortions can vary significantly, depending on the population being studied, whether of an infertile group under fertility treatment or of the general female population of reproductive age. In fact, women undergoing in vitro fertilization have been found to have 18% pregnancy loss compared with the almost 8% found in women with RPL.

Epidemiologic variables


The risk of RPL varies from about 11% 11% in the age group between 20 and 24, to over 50% in women between the ages of 40 and 44 years.

Previous miscarriage

The risk of having a miscarriage is between 17% and 25% after 2 consecutive abortions, but between 25% and 46% after 3.


One common identified cause of RPL is a thrombophilia, which is also associated with preterm births, pregnancy-induced hypertension and eclampsia, antiphospholipid syndromes (APS), intrauterine growth restriction and placental insufficiency.

The most common mutations behind heritable thrombophilias are those of factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin gene (G20210A). FVL causes the risk of thrombosis to increase by 5-10 times even in carriers (with one normal and one defective gene), and 80 times in homozygotes (both genes carry the same defect).

The discrepancy in carriers results from the interaction between the small increase in absolute risk and the effects of additional risk factors such as pregnancy-associated hypercoagulable states, which results in serious thrombosis. On the other hand, the G20210A mutation does occur in 1-4% of the general population in the US, especially among those who originally came from the south of Europe.

Women with this mutation have 3 times the average risk of venous clots, as well as higher odds for heart attacks and strokes, compared to those who do not carry the mutation.

Research shows the risk of RPL is increased by 2 times in women with either G20210A or FVL mutations. The interesting fact is that these inherited thrombophilias are far more likely to cause sporadic miscarriages than to result in RPL.

Most carriers fail to show any clinical signs of hypercoagulability, and may have one or no pregnancy losses with one or more successful pregnancies. Thus, most carriers are probably missed due to lack of testing in women who have carried at least one fetus to term and had a live delivery.

Antiphospholipid syndrome

APS occurs in only 2% of healthy pregnancies, but in a fifth of women who have unexplained RPL, but a third of women with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Uterine anomalies

These are found in 3% of women overall, but in 27% of women with RPL. The rate of miscarriage in women with a bicornuate uterus is 47%, in uterine septa it is 26%, but with a unicornuate uterus it is 17%.

Single gene mutations

Several mutations such as G6PD deficiency or phenylketonuria can cause a higher risk of miscarriage.

Endocrine disorders

When diabetes is poorly controlled, the risk of sporadic miscarriage increases because of several mechanisms. However, the actual increase in the risk of RPL is not significant, according to several studies.

The same is true for deficient thyroid function. Some of the confusion may be because disruptive thyroid antibodies are not always associated with overt abnormality in thyroid hormone levels, but may still undermine normal thyroid function as well as be associated with other autoimmune states, and lead to miscarriage. High prolactin levels independent of thyroid disease may also be associated with miscarriage.


Pregnancies in a woman with a history of anovulation, such as polycystic ovarian syndrome, are more prone to miscarry because of the abnormal hormonal environment which may lead to an unfavorable endometrium for proper implantation and growth of early pregnancy.

Smoking, drinking and drug abuse

While each of these is associated with sporadic abortions, RPL as a direct result of any of these is not established.

Luteal phase defects

The lack of specific diagnostic tests and evidence for the efficacy of treatment of supposed luteal phase defects has led to controversy over the actual existence or importance of this factor. Luteal phase support is possible with appropriate administration of estrogen and progesterone.


Alloimmune factors and environmental causes such as chemical exposure through tap water are also linked to RPL but evidence is weak.


One study showed that of 1214 pregnancies, those with RPL were generally older but had the same number of deliveries as the general population. However, these women were typically at higher risk of having bad pregnancy outcomes, such as:

  • Increased history of antepartum hemorrhage (bleeding before delivery), either in the patient or her family
  • Increased chance that the personal or family history was positive for fetal anomalies
  • Increased number of stillborn babies
  • Increased newborn deaths

Further Reading

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2019

Dr. Liji Thomas

Written by

Dr. Liji Thomas

Dr. Liji Thomas is an OB-GYN, who graduated from the Government Medical College, University of Calicut, Kerala, in 2001. Liji practiced as a full-time consultant in obstetrics/gynecology in a private hospital for a few years following her graduation. She has counseled hundreds of patients facing issues from pregnancy-related problems and infertility, and has been in charge of over 2,000 deliveries, striving always to achieve a normal delivery rather than operative.


Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Thomas, Liji. (2019, June 16). Recurrent Miscarriage Epidemiology. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 13, 2024 from

  • MLA

    Thomas, Liji. "Recurrent Miscarriage Epidemiology". News-Medical. 13 April 2024. <>.

  • Chicago

    Thomas, Liji. "Recurrent Miscarriage Epidemiology". News-Medical. (accessed April 13, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Thomas, Liji. 2019. Recurrent Miscarriage Epidemiology. News-Medical, viewed 13 April 2024,


The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Eating fish during pregnancy doesn't shape kids' heart health, study finds