Doctor associated with MMR vaccine and autism link wins High Court appeal

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

A doctor, whose name was struck off over the MMR (vaccine against Measles, Mumps and Rubella) jab controversy, has yesterday won a High Court appeal to clear his name.

Professor John Walker-Smith had been found guilty of professional misconduct following claims he took part in unapproved research that suggested links between the vaccine, bowel disease and autism. Professor Walker-Smith lost his license to practice in May 2010 along with Dr Andrew Wakefield, who led the research. A General Medical Council’s ‘fitness to practice’ panel found both men guilty of misconduct over the way the work was conducted after 217 days of deliberation – the longest disciplinary case in the body’s 150- year history.

In 2004, the Lancet announced a partial retraction, and 10 of the 13 authors disowned it. Wakefield was the paper's chief author and Walker-Smith the then head of the department of pediatric gastroenterology at the Royal Free, where the research was carried out. Walker-Smith's clinical role focused on treatment related to sick children, while his academic work included collaborating in research with Wakefield.

Professor Walker-Smith, 75, always denied allegations that he had participated in the research under the guise of carrying out clinical investigations and treatment of young patients, including colonoscopies, at the Royal Free Hospital in North London. The retired doctor said the work was necessary for the purposes of diagnosis and treatment, and was not done to aid the research.

The decision to strike off had been defended at a recent hearing as “just and fair – not wrong” by Joanna Glynn QC, for the GMC. She said, “In spite of inadequate reasons it is quite clear on overwhelming evidence that the charges are made out.”

Mr. Justice Mitting criticized the disciplinary panel’s ‘inadequate and superficial reasoning’ and ‘wrong conclusions’ before ruling, “The panel’s determination cannot stand. I therefore quash it.” He called for such cases to be overseen by someone with ‘judicial experience’ in future.

As he left court with relatives, Professor Walker-Smith said, “I am extremely pleased with the outcome of my appeal. There has been a great burden on me and my family since the allegations were first made in 2004 and throughout the hearing that ran from 2007 to 2010. I am relieved that this matter is now over.” He paid tribute to his supporters, who included the parents of many children with autism and bowel disease seen by him at the Royal Free Hospital in north London up to his retirement in 2001.

Mr. Justice Mitting added that Dr Wakefield’s comments and subsequent publicity about possible links between autism and the MMR jab, which protects against measles, mumps and rubella, “had a predictable adverse effect upon the take-up of the vaccine” which was “of great concern to those responsible for public health” He stressed, “There is now no respectable body of opinion which supports [Dr Wakefield’s] hypothesis that MMR vaccine and autism [or] enterocolitis are causally linked.”

Dr Helen Bedford, a senior lecturer at the UCL Institute of Child Health, added, “There has never been any sound evidence of a link. Indeed, there is a strong body of research showing no link. However, many parents who were anxious about the safety of the MMR vaccine decided not to have their children immunized. Fortunately, it is never too late to have the MMR vaccine and I would strongly recommend that young people who missed out when they were younger have two doses of the vaccine to protect them.”

The GMC’s chief executive, Niall Dickson, said ‘key changes’ to its disciplinary hearings were already being prepared. He said, “Today's ruling does not however reopen the debate about the MMR vaccine and autism. As Mr. Justice Mitting observed in his judgment, ‘There is now no respectable body of opinion which supports (Dr Wakefield's) hypothesis, that MMR vaccine and autism/enterocolitis are causally linked’.”

Dr. Ananya Mandal

Written by

Dr. Ananya Mandal

Dr. Ananya Mandal is a doctor by profession, lecturer by vocation and a medical writer by passion. She specialized in Clinical Pharmacology after her bachelor's (MBBS). For her, health communication is not just writing complicated reviews for professionals but making medical knowledge understandable and available to the general public as well.


Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Mandal, Ananya. (2018, August 23). Doctor associated with MMR vaccine and autism link wins High Court appeal. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 18, 2024 from

  • MLA

    Mandal, Ananya. "Doctor associated with MMR vaccine and autism link wins High Court appeal". News-Medical. 18 April 2024. <>.

  • Chicago

    Mandal, Ananya. "Doctor associated with MMR vaccine and autism link wins High Court appeal". News-Medical. (accessed April 18, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Mandal, Ananya. 2018. Doctor associated with MMR vaccine and autism link wins High Court appeal. News-Medical, viewed 18 April 2024,


  1. John Stone John Stone United Kingdom says:

    The Lancet did not retract the paper till 2010. 10 of the authors retracted "an interpretation" in 2004 but none of them have ever repudiated the paper. In  fact, Profs Walker-Smith and Murch although they had signed the "retraction of an interpretation" defended the paper's fundamental integrity at the GMC hearing and Mr Justice Mitting's finding on Wednesday supports their account.

  2. Ligia Calvinisti Ligia Calvinisti United States says:

    Thank you for having the courage of standing  up for the true. My son has a damaged  from the MMR. He developed ASPERGUER'S. a few days after he was vaccinated.
    As a parent I'm grateful that the world es getting to know more and more about the damage of the vaccinations.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Gut flora disruption in infancy linked to autism and ADHD