Developmental delay should not prevent implants for deaf children

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Children should not be excluded from having cochlear implantation just because they have impaired cognitive development, say researchers.

Such developmental impairment may only be temporary and it is possible that these children will catch up after several years, say Harukazu Hiraumi (Kyoto University, Japan) and colleagues.

Previous studies have reported that children with developmental delays have poor development of speech perception skills after implantation. However, such studies have only compared the speech outcomes between delayed and nondelayed children, and not the relationship between the extent of pre-operative cognitive delay and outcomes, explains the team.

"It is necessary to examine the relationship between development and speech outcomes in each child," say the researchers.

In the current study, which included 35 prelinguistically deafened children who underwent multichannel cochlear implantation, 31% of the children were considered developmentally delayed, as defined by a score of less than 80 for the cognitive‑adaptive area on the Kyoto scale of psychologic development.

As reported in Auris Nasus Larynx, children who had delayed development before implantation had significantly lower speech perception scores 2 years later compared with children who had normal pre-operative development scores (>80 on cognitive‑adaptive area of Kyoto scale).

However, correlation analysis showed that the relationship between the development scores and the speech perception scores was weak, with large individual variability among children with similar developmental statuses, write the researchers.

Indeed, some children with developmental delays had speech perception scores that were similar to children without developmental delays, they report.

"This result seems reasonable because the outcome of the cochlear implantation can be influenced by several factors, including the habilitation program, technological improvements, and family characteristics."

The team concludes that it does not seem possible to define a developmental quotient cutoff level for the indication of cochlear implantation and it is not appropriate to exclude children for candidacy for cochlear implantation based only on a developmental delay.

Licensed from medwireNews with permission from Springer Healthcare Ltd. ©Springer Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved. Neither of these parties endorse or recommend any commercial products, services, or equipment.

Sally Robertson

Written by

Sally Robertson

Sally first developed an interest in medical communications when she took on the role of Journal Development Editor for BioMed Central (BMC), after having graduated with a degree in biomedical science from Greenwich University.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Robertson, Sally. (2018, August 23). Developmental delay should not prevent implants for deaf children. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 25, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120710/Developmental-delay-should-not-prevent-implants-for-deaf-children.aspx.

  • MLA

    Robertson, Sally. "Developmental delay should not prevent implants for deaf children". News-Medical. 25 April 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120710/Developmental-delay-should-not-prevent-implants-for-deaf-children.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Robertson, Sally. "Developmental delay should not prevent implants for deaf children". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120710/Developmental-delay-should-not-prevent-implants-for-deaf-children.aspx. (accessed April 25, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Robertson, Sally. 2018. Developmental delay should not prevent implants for deaf children. News-Medical, viewed 25 April 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120710/Developmental-delay-should-not-prevent-implants-for-deaf-children.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Study reveals age-specific differences in nasal cells' response to SARS-CoV-2