6MWT wording change could enhance serial utility

Researchers have found that the distance patients cover during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) depends on the instructions they are given, indicating that changing the current protocol may enhance the accuracy and reproducibility of the test.

Steven Nathan and colleagues, from the Inova Fairfax Hospital in Falls Church, Virginia, USA, show that when patients were told to complete the test “as fast as possible” they walked over 50 m more than patients given the standard instruction to walk “as far as possible.”

“[W]ith the focus on endurance rather than speed, it is possible that patients may have variable strategies of how best to pace themselves, even from visit to visit,” the team comments.

“This may partly explain why change in the 6MWT distance is not a good predictor of outcomes, as opposed to the predictive ability of the baseline distance.”

The researchers studied 24 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and other forms of interstitial lung disease. Each patient completed four 6MWT with a 15-minute interval between, and were given a different instruction each time: “walk as far as you can” (standard walk); “walk as fast as you can” (fast walk); “walk at your normal pace” (normal walk); and “walk at a leisurely pace” (leisure walk).

Patients walked the shortest distances during the leisure and normal walks, at 354 m and 413 m, respectively. They walked the furthest during the fast walk, at a mean of 547 m, which was significantly further than the mean of 494 m during the standard walk. Overall, 87.5% of patients walked further during the fast walk than the standard walk.

Writing in Chest, Nathan and colleagues say that the wide range of distances attained during the different tests, at an average intrapatient range of 199 m, underscores the importance of the pretest instruction on determining how far patients walk.

The team acknowledges that their findings will need further validation in a larger number of patients across different disease groups and severity. Nevertheless, they conclude that the data “suggest that consideration be given to changing the standard 6MWT instruction to maximize the distance and thereby possibly reduce the inherent intrapatient variability that undermines the usefulness of this test and its use in a serial fashion.”

Licensed from medwireNews with permission from Springer Healthcare Ltd. ©Springer Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved. Neither of these parties endorse or recommend any commercial products, services, or equipment.

Kirsty Oswald

Written by

Kirsty Oswald

Kirsty has a B.Sc. in Human Sciences from University College London. After several years working as medical copywriter, she became a medical journalist and is now freelance. Kirsty also works part-time as an editor for a London-based charity. She is particularly interested in the social and cultural aspects of science.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Oswald, Kirsty. (2018, August 23). 6MWT wording change could enhance serial utility. News-Medical. Retrieved on December 03, 2022 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20131213/6MWT-wording-change-could-enhance-serial-utility.aspx.

  • MLA

    Oswald, Kirsty. "6MWT wording change could enhance serial utility". News-Medical. 03 December 2022. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20131213/6MWT-wording-change-could-enhance-serial-utility.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Oswald, Kirsty. "6MWT wording change could enhance serial utility". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20131213/6MWT-wording-change-could-enhance-serial-utility.aspx. (accessed December 03, 2022).

  • Harvard

    Oswald, Kirsty. 2018. 6MWT wording change could enhance serial utility. News-Medical, viewed 03 December 2022, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20131213/6MWT-wording-change-could-enhance-serial-utility.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post
You might also like...
Frozen and viable: successful culture of replicating SARS-CoV-2 from hospital aerosol samples after freezing