CoGEN Congress 2019: Speakers' overviews

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Update on the use of exome sequencing for the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities

Friday, November 8, 2019

11:00-11:30

Mark Kilby, UK

The interim analysis of the PAGE study (Lancet. 2019) noted that in this prospective cohort study, two groups in Birmingham and London recruited patients (fetuses with structural anomaly on USS) from 34 fetal medicine units in England and Scotland. We used whole-exome sequencing (WES) to evaluate the presence of genetic variants in developmental disorder genes (diagnostic genetic variants) in a cohort of fetuses with structural anomalies and samples from their parents, after exclusion of aneuploidy and large CNVs. Women were eligible for inclusion if they were undergoing invasive testing for identified nuchal translucency or structural anomalies in their fetus, as detected by ultrasound after 11 weeks of gestation. The partners of these women also had to consent to participate. Sequencing results were interpreted with a targeted virtual gene panel for developmental disorders that comprised 1628 genes. Genetic results related to fetal structural anomaly phenotypes were then validated and reported postnatally. The primary endpoint, which was assessed in all fetuses, was the detection of diagnostic genetic variants considered to have caused the fetal developmental anomaly.

Over a three year period, the clinical data were collected until end of March, 2018. After exclusion of fetuses with aneuploidy and CNVs, 610 fetuses with structural anomalies and 1202 matched parental samples (analyzed as 596 fetus-parental trios, including two sets of twins, and 14 fetus-parent dyads) were analyzed by WES. After bioinformatic filtering and prioritization according to allele frequency and effect on protein and inheritance pattern, 321 genetic variants (representing 255 potential diagnoses) were selected as potentially pathogenic genetic variants (diagnostic genetic variants), and these variants were reviewed by a multidisciplinary clinical review panel. A diagnostic genetic variant was identified in 52 (8·5%; 95% CI 6·4-11·0) of 610 fetuses assessed and an additional 24 (3·9%) fetuses had a variant of uncertain significance that had potential clinical usefulness. Detection of diagnostic genetic variants enabled us to distinguish between syndromic and non-syndromic fetal anomalies (eg, congenital heart disease only vs a syndrome with congenital heart disease and learning disability). Diagnostic genetic variants were present in 22 (15·4%) of 143 fetuses with multisystem anomalies (ie, more than one fetal structural anomaly), nine (11·1%) of 81 fetuses with cardiac anomalies, and ten (15·4%) of 65 fetuses with skeletal anomalies; these phenotypes were most commonly associated with diagnostic variants. However, diagnostic genetic variants were least common in fetuses with isolated increased nuchal translucency (≥4·0 mm) in the first trimester (in three [3·2%] of 93 fetuses).

These data and the potential use of prenatal WES will be discussed and how it has informed the development of the routine clinical Fetal Medicine / Genetics Clinic within National Health England.

Debate: Only evidence based treatments should be offered in ART: AGAINST

Saturday, November 9, 2019

16:45-17:30

Charles Kingsland, UK

For over 2000 years, the medical profession has sworn an oath to do no harm to their patients whilst in their care.

This has formed the basis of medical practice until very recently when the concept of “evidence based medicine” was adopted.

The evolution from “first do no harm” to wholly evidence based medicine like biology itself, will take time to develop and although this concept has taken a foothold in modern medicine, one could argue its true value in many aspects of day to day practice.

Yet, in reproductive medicine, we are expected from day one to adopt this new fashion on the assumption that will be of benefit for all and leave behind 2000 years of other aspects of care to serve the population so well.

It is this fanaticism by our regulators that will be evaluated during this debate.

Expanded PGT and genome editing

Saturday, November 9, 2019

12:30-13:00

Nathan Treff, USA

Expanded PGT provides the first opportunity to test for aneuploidy, translocations, and monogenic and polygenic disorders, with a single high throughput and automatable platform. Validation was performed on several positive controls with 97 to >99% concordance for each type of testing. Clinical experience with ePGT and application to gene edited research embryos will also be discussed.

Source: http://cogen2019.cme-congresses.com/

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Integrating social determinants of health to enhance heart failure risk prediction