Assessment of pre-procedure versus spray-as-you-go airway anesthesia protocols in bronchoscopy

Background and objectives

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy involves various topical airway anesthesia protocols, which can impact patient comfort, procedural ease, and overall outcomes. This study aimed to compare pre-procedure lignocaine spray (PPL) and spray-as-you-go (SAYG) airway anesthesia in terms of patient discomfort and operator comfort during fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Methods

A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Pulmonology Department of Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from March 2021 to March 2022. Fifty participants were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 25 each). Standard procedural sedation with midazolam and 2 mL of 4% lignocaine spray in the oropharynx was used to suppress the gag reflex. Additionally, 2% lignocaine spray was administered during the procedure according to body weight (3 mg/kg) via oral scope insertion. Cough severity, pain perception, and operator comfort were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale, Faces Pain Rating Scale, and a 4-point Likert scale, respectively.

Results

Demographic characteristics were comparable between the groups, with a minor age difference (PPL: 53.25 years vs. SAYG: 50.88 years, p = 0.017). No significant differences were observed in pain perception, cough scores, or procedure duration between the PPL and SAYG groups. Operator comfort scores showed a trend favoring PPL (60% rated as "comfortable" or "very comfortable" vs. 28% in SAYG), though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.108).

Conclusions

This study concludes that PPL spray and SAYG protocols are comparable in efficacy for FOB, with no significant differences in patient-reported pain, discomfort, coughing, or procedure duration. Operator comfort was slightly higher with the pre-procedural protocol, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Nonetheless, even a minor improvement in operator comfort could potentially lead to reduced fatigue, improved focus, and enhanced performance. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to validate these observations.