I have carefully analyzed the graph, to assess the outcomes for those previously infected. The numbers were so small, I had to count pixels to get an estimate. Previously infected citizens represent about 3% of the omicron victims. Yet, the language of the article suggests they were hit as hard as the vaccinated. I appreciate this atricle. This and many other studies have a scientific approach in view, but they lack the rigour I seek. Once someone is infected, they can fall into at least seven(7) categories, and more: unvaccinated; partially vaccinated; fully vaccinated; fully vaccinated with some boosters; fully vaccinated with all boosters; previously infected; previously infected with any of the above (which would be several more categories). My heart aches to see the data broken down to that level. Why not?