New AI tool accurately predicts how patients would fare after surgeries

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

An artificial intelligence (AI) tool developed by investigators at the Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai and colleagues at two other institutions accurately predicted how patients would fare after surgeries and procedures.

The results, published in The Lancet Digital Health, include data from patients from three healthcare systems: Cedars-Sinai, Stanford University and Columbia University. All patients in the study underwent a surgical procedure, including open heart surgery, other major surgeries, and minimally invasive procedures involving a catheter or endoscope.

Investigators trained an AI model on pre-operative electrocardiograms, discovering a new use for the 130-year-old test. Invented in the late-1800s, an electrocardiogram is a commonly deployed test that involves placing electrodes on the skin to measure the heart's electrical activity and assess how well the heart is functioning.

This is the first electrocardiogram-based AI algorithm that predicts post-operative mortality. Previously, algorithms have been used to assess long-term mortality as well as individual disease states, but determining post-surgical outcomes helps inform the actual decision to do surgery."

David Ouyang, MD, cardiologist in the Department of Cardiology in the Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai, and corresponding author of the study

Investigators paired patients' electrocardiograms from before the surgery or procedure, with their outcomes after the surgery or procedure, and asked the algorithm to find associations or patterns in the electrocardiogram waveforms.

While classifying most patients as low risk, those individuals the algorithm identified as high risk had nearly a 9-fold increased probability of post-operative mortality.

"As it now stands, clinicians only have a modest ability to predict how a patient is going to do after surgery," said Ouyang, also a faculty member in the Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine at Cedars-Sinai. "Current clinical risk prediction tools are insufficient. This AI model could potentially be used to determine exactly which patients should undergo an intervention and which patients might be too sick."

Every medical intervention comes with risk, and doctors currently rely on guidelines from medical societies to determine a patient's individual risk.

"In cardiology, we're fortunate to have many life-saving procedures, everything from catheter-based procedures to open-heart surgery, so we're often trying to think about who are the right patients for the right procedure," said Christine M. Albert, MD, MPH, chair of the Department of Cardiology in the Smidt Heart Institute and the other corresponding author of the study. "A better understanding of risk, particularly by using a commonly obtained diagnostic test, can inform important medical decisions."

Investigators are currently studying how the algorithm could be translated into a web application that would be widely available for physicians and patients.

Journal reference:

Ouyang, D., et al. (2023). Electrocardiographic deep learning for predicting post-procedural mortality: a model development and validation study. The Lancet Digital Health.


The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New analysis sheds light on cancer incidence and mortality trends in the UK