Taiwanese hemophiliacs infected by HIV-contaminated medications petition US Supreme Court

Baum Hedlund announces that Taiwanese hemophiliacs infected by HIV-contaminated medications have petitioned the United States Supreme Court to allow their claims to proceed in California. Their suits contend that California-based defendants illegally used paid plasma donors at high risk for transmitting blood-borne diseases (i.v. drug users, prisoners, and promiscuous urban gay males) to make injected anti-hemophilia medications. Those medications provided hemophiliacs with proteins needed to stop their uncontrolled bleeding episodes. In the absence of a viral deactivation process, when hemophiliacs infused such medications, they were exposed to whatever diseases those risky donors carried, which eventually included HIV. Once a viral deactivation treatment (heating) was implemented, the defendants continued selling their inventories of HIV-contaminated medications to markets that had not yet developed AIDS "hysteria", e.g. Taiwan.

“If we see the need for a heat-treated product in the Far East, we will react to the demand swiftly. Otherwise, we will try to continue to dominate the markets with low-cost standard [anti-hemophilia medications].”

A 1985 Far East Marketing Plan obtained from Defendant Bayer outlined their strategy: "If we see the need for a heat-treated product in the Far East, we will react to the demand swiftly. Otherwise, we will try to continue to dominate the markets with low-cost standard [anti-hemophilia medications]." Taiwanese hemophiliacs were unaware of this strategy and the defendants' risky manufacturing practices until 2003 when the New York Times published an article summarizing internal documents filed into evidence in US hemophiliacs' cases. Although the Taiwanese hemophiliacs' contentions were amply documented, the Seventh Circuit upheld a lower court's dismissal of their case on grounds that the evidence they had presented showing fraudulent concealment did not stop the expiration of statutes of limitations and that the claims were inconveniently filed in California instead of Taiwan.

The Taiwanese hemophiliacs today filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the United States Supreme Court requesting relief from decisions dismissing their tort and contract causes of action. They are challenging lower courts' rulings which they believe conflict with federal and state law.

Source Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman, P.C.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

Sign in to keep reading

We're committed to providing free access to quality science. By registering and providing insight into your preferences you're joining a community of over 1m science interested individuals and help us to provide you with insightful content whilst keeping our service free.

or

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Single injection of gene therapy at birth may offer lasting protection against HIV