Integration of diverse set of species and environments can enhance biomedical research cycle

In an article published today in Science, a multidisciplinary research team from more than 10 universities and research institutes outlines how integrating a more diverse set of species and environments could enhance the biomedical research cycle.

The viruses that cause COVID-19, AIDS, Ebola, and rabies - among others - all made the lethal jump from wildlife into humans.

Understanding how the immune system works in animals that live with coronaviruses in a natural environment, such as bats, can give us direction for developing treatments and vaccines to protect humans from viruses.

The very first vaccine arose from observing people interacting with animals in a realworld environment. Specifically, milkmaids who acquired a mild cowpox infection from cows were protected from the deadly smallpox.

That observation led to the idea of inoculating people with non-lethal viruses to protect them from deadly viruses. This type of discovery can only be made by studying new species in variable environments."

Andrew Flies, Study Lead Author, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania

Modern research relies heavily on mouse experiments in laboratory settings, which limits the scope for this type of ground-breaking discovery.

For example, a new class of antibodies, often referred to as nanobodies, was discovered in camels. Easier and faster to make than traditional antibodies used in biomedicine, camel-derived nanobodies are playing an import role in biomedical research, including the global COVID-19 response.

This shows how stepping out of the lab and studying new species can yield large long-term payoffs.

"We are really excited to see how our initial group discussions held at the first Australian Wild and Comparative Immunology (WACI) workshop led to publishing a Perspective article in a world leading journal", said co-author Dr Jerome Le Nours, from the Biomedicine Discovery Institute at Monash University, who was co-organiser of the WACI meeting.

"There are many excellent wildlife and disease ecologists, veterinarian scientists and immunologists in Australia, and beyond."

"We hope that our contribution will inspire them to seek mutually beneficial, inter-disciplinary collaboration" said Associate Professor Anne Peters, Monash University, co-author and consortium collaborator.

WACI Consortium collaborator and co-author, Associate Professor Julie Old from Western Sydney University, said it's important for immunology research to include more diverse species.

"If we want to evolve our understanding of the immune system, and potentially get ahead of any future pandemics, the research community needs to expand."

"We need to broaden our scope, and bring new species and new environments into the research paradigm."

''Realising wild immunology needs initiatives like the WACI Consortium that harness the wide expertise of scientists and diverse technologies within individual areas' says Associate Professor Michelle Power from Macquarie University.

"The risks of emerging infectious diseases are not going away. We need new ideas, new tools and dynamic collaboration to address them".

Director of the Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Distinguished Professor Alison Venn, said new technology has broken down research barriers to integrating new species and environments into the research cycle.

"Proactive investment in wild immunology can stimulate discoveries with real-world applications for human and veterinary medicine and conservation. It could help us prepare for the next pandemic."

Source:
Journal reference:

Flies, A. S., & Wild Comparative Immunology Consortium (2020) Rewilding immunology. Science. doi.org/10.1126/science.abb8664.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
You might also like... ×
SARS-CoV-2 exposure five times more likely among Black and Hispanic pregnant women