Novel 3D chromosome mapping method can reliably reveal hidden structural variants

Standard laboratory tests can fail to detect many disease-causing DNA changes. Now, a novel 3D chromosome mapping method can reliably reveal these hidden structural variants and lead to new discoveries. The findings on this groundbreaking tool can be found in a new study in The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, published by Elsevier, and are poised to transform diagnostic testing and treatment for genetic disorders.

Traditional methods sequence DNA in a linear, one-dimensional way, reading the genetic code as if it were a flat line of text. In contrast, 3D chromosome mapping captures the spatial relationships between different parts of the genome. It reveals how the long strands of DNA fold and interact with each other in the three-dimensional space of the cell nucleus, which is vital for detecting certain structural changes that are invisible to conventional linear tests.

Researchers applied genomic proximity mapping (GPM), a genome-wide Hi-C (high-throughput chromosome conformation capture sequencing)-based NGS assay, to DNA from 123 individuals with suspected genetic disorders. This approach captured the 3D contacts in the genome, which allowed the detection of both copy-number changes and rearrangements in DNA. GPM correctly identified all known large chromosomal variants (110 deletions/duplications and 27 rearrangements) with 100% concordance. It also uncovered 12 novel structural variants that were missed by standard clinical tests.

We were excited by how much hidden complexity GPM revealed. Using modern tools like GPM allows us to uncover hidden DNA rearrangements that standard tests miss. For example, one case with a known three-way translocation actually had 13 breakpoints across four chromosomes when mapped by GPM. In every patient with multiple rearrangements, GPM uncovered additional cryptic changes. It was also impressive that GPM detected low-level mosaic variants, or cells with different genetic makeup, with high sensitivity. These discoveries went beyond our expectations and highlight the power of this new method."

He Fang, PhD, co-lead investigator, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle

Key results of the study are as follow: 

  • 100% detection of known variants: GPM found all 110 previously identified copy-number variants and 27 rearrangements in the cohort.
  • High precision on complex events: Breakpoints of both balanced and unbalanced rearrangements were pinpointed to a high degree of accuracy (within ~10 kb), and GPM even worked on challenging samples like preserved tissue while detecting mosaic changes.
  • New discoveries: GPM revealed 12 additional structural variants that standard methods had missed.
  • Hidden complexity: In every case that had multiple rearrangements by traditional tests, GPM found extra cryptic changes.

GPM requires substantially less DNA than is typically needed for conventional cytogenetic methods or emerging technologies such as optical genome mapping (OGM) and long-read sequencing (LRS), thereby enhancing its practicality for real-world clinical implementation.

Identifying the exact genetic rearrangement may open the door to targeted therapies or clinical trials specific to those variants.

Co-lead investigator Yajuan J. Liu, PhD, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, concludes, "GPM offers broad clinical benefits. It enables high-resolution, comprehensive genomic characterization, even from compromised samples such as low-quality or archived preserved tissue. As genomic medicine moves toward precision diagnostics, this new tool addresses current limitations in genetic testing, improving diagnostics and empowering doctors to provide personalized treatment, tailored monitoring, better prognosis, and improved family counseling."

Source:
Journal reference:

Fang, H., et al. (2025). Evaluation of Genomic Proximity Mapping for Detecting Genomic and Chromosomal Structural Variants in Constitutional Disorders. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.07.005

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Long-read sequencing uncovers massive DNA elements shaping human oral microbiome