1. withwingsIfly withwingsIfly United States says:

    Based on the variables of this study. The conclusion is useless. The study is only looking at 7 days after the vaccination which in turn is really only looking at possible causes of anaphylaxis shock and other allergic type reactions. That has not been the situation with this vaccine so the validity of the study is actually useless. Because if they would have actually taken the time to look up other increases in medical conditions up to one year post vaccine then they would have a more variety of illnesses that have went up statistically in populations that normally don't have medical conditions IE blood clots in 30-year-olds or the development of diabetes type 1 diabetes in late 20 and 30 year old males that do not fit the profile of type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.