What was the prevalence of adverse events following first and second dose COVID-19 vaccinations in England?

In England, the immunization program for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causal agent of the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, began in December 2020. The UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) initially recommended the COVID-19 vaccine for all adults above 18. 

Study: Adverse events following first and second dose COVID-19 vaccination in England, October 2020 to September 2021: a national vaccine surveillance platform self-controlled case series study. Image Credit: Telnov Oleksii/Shutterstock
Study: Adverse events following first and second dose COVID-19 vaccination in England, October 2020 to September 2021: a national vaccine surveillance platform self-controlled case series study. Image Credit: Telnov Oleksii/Shutterstock

Background

Older adults, health and social care workers, care home residents and staff, and front-line workers, were prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination. Later, children above 12 years of age and with underlying chronic conditions were considered for vaccination.

Since July 2021, children have begun receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. The 16- and 17-year-olds received vaccines in August 2021, and 12- to 15-year-olds received their first vaccine in September 2021. The COVID-19 booster program was also initiated in September 2021.

Until December 2022, the UK government provided one of the three vaccines. These were Comirnaty (BNT162b2), manufactured by BioNTech-Pfizer, Vaxzevria (ChAdOx1-S), developed by Oxford-AstraZeneca, and Spikevax (mRNA-1273), manufactured by Moderna. These vaccines were found to be highly effective in preventing severe COVID-19 infection.

The COVID-19 vaccines received emergency use authorization based on clinical trial data, which reported their safety profiles and rare incidence of adverse events upon immunization. Post-licensure follow-up was conducted to assess the occurrence of rarer adverse events of interest (AEIs) after vaccination in larger general populations.

In extremely rare occasions, adverse events of concurrent thrombosis and thrombocytopenia were reported following immunization with the first dose of Vaxzevria. Thrombotic thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), which has also been referred to as vaccine-induced immune thrombosis and thrombocytopenia (VITT), is a rare immune condition where pathologic antibodies to platelet factor four cause blood clots in different parts of the body. In addition, it also lowers platelet count. Similarly, after the first dose of Comirnaty or Spikevax vaccination, a very rare incidence of myocarditis and acute pericarditis was observed. 

Large-scale observational studies following COVID-19 vaccination have also reported the incidence of rare neurological adverse events, such as Bell’s palsy and Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS). Particularly, in the English cohort, an increased risk of GBS and Bell’s palsy was found after the Vaxzevria vaccination. However, such observation was not found in the Scottish cohort after being immunized with the same vaccine.

Considering these adverse effects, in May 2021, the JCVI recommended adults under 40 years of age be provided with an alternative vaccine. It is imperative to conduct post-authorization surveillance to monitor vaccine safety in the real world, which also helps maintain public confidence in vaccines.

About the study

A recent Eurosurveillance study focused on estimating the incidence of a prespecified list of AEIs following the first and second doses of the COVID-19 vaccination. Real-world primary care data was used to determine the safety profiles of different vaccine brands.

The authors obtained data from the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners Clinical Informatics Digital Hub (ORCHID), England. This study methodically compared the incidence of medically attended AEIs, following COVID-19 vaccination, among 781,200 individuals.

Findings

After COVID-19 immunization, fewer individuals required medical attention for AEIs, i.e., under 10% of the registered population. Even this estimate did not exclusively identify individuals who developed AEI post-vaccination, as the data included most individuals who sought medical attention for AEI development within seven days of vaccination, which may not necessarily be causally related to COVID-19 vaccination.

After the first and second doses of vaccination with Comirnaty and Vaxzevria, the prevalence of medically attended AEIs was much lower, at around 3 to 7%, compared with background levels within seven days of immunization. However, a 20% increase in the occurrence of medically attended AEIs was observed after the first dose of the Spikevax vaccine. As the age of vaccinees increased, fewer medically attended AEIs prevailed for both Comirnaty and Vaxzevria vaccines.

The safety profiles of COVID-19 vaccines, developed by different brands, varied marginally. However, a considerable difference was observed in the generation of non-specific side effects. For instance, the first dose of Vaxzevria led to variable skin conditions, while the second dose of Comirnaty caused an enhanced incidence of immune and lymphatic conditions.

Conclusions

One of the key strengths of this study is the utilization of a well-established ORCHID practice network, which has high data quality. Since the ORCHID regularly receives feed from the National Immunisation Management System (NIMS), a valid COVID-19 vaccination record was obtained.

The current study also contains some limitations, including uncertainties about whether all relevant events associated with medically attended AEIs were considered. In addition, since the present study only assessed the incidence of medically attended AEIs after a single or double dose of COVID-19 vaccination, it could be considered passive surveillance. Furthermore, the authors failed to consider SARS-CoV-2 infections before vaccination, which might be associated with some AEIs. 

To summarize, COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a small increase in the incidence of rare but serious adverse events. In the future, more research must be conducted to understand better whether previous infection leads to higher or lower incidence of AEIs.

Journal reference:
Dr. Priyom Bose

Written by

Dr. Priyom Bose

Priyom holds a Ph.D. in Plant Biology and Biotechnology from the University of Madras, India. She is an active researcher and an experienced science writer. Priyom has also co-authored several original research articles that have been published in reputed peer-reviewed journals. She is also an avid reader and an amateur photographer.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Bose, Priyom. (2023, January 23). What was the prevalence of adverse events following first and second dose COVID-19 vaccinations in England?. News-Medical. Retrieved on February 01, 2023 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230123/What-was-the-prevalence-of-adverse-events-following-first-and-second-dose-COVID-19-vaccinations-in-England.aspx.

  • MLA

    Bose, Priyom. "What was the prevalence of adverse events following first and second dose COVID-19 vaccinations in England?". News-Medical. 01 February 2023. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230123/What-was-the-prevalence-of-adverse-events-following-first-and-second-dose-COVID-19-vaccinations-in-England.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Bose, Priyom. "What was the prevalence of adverse events following first and second dose COVID-19 vaccinations in England?". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230123/What-was-the-prevalence-of-adverse-events-following-first-and-second-dose-COVID-19-vaccinations-in-England.aspx. (accessed February 01, 2023).

  • Harvard

    Bose, Priyom. 2023. What was the prevalence of adverse events following first and second dose COVID-19 vaccinations in England?. News-Medical, viewed 01 February 2023, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230123/What-was-the-prevalence-of-adverse-events-following-first-and-second-dose-COVID-19-vaccinations-in-England.aspx.

Comments

  1. Colin Baker Colin Baker United Kingdom says:

    I had blood clots after second oxford zenicare vaccine.

  2. Gina Rosas Gina Rosas United States says:

    I have Venus insufficiency in my right leg, which I never had before the COVID shot, after I got the two shots my left side of my brain started hurting and it's taking a year to feel better, It hurts so bad I had to visit the neurologist, I was on medications from an endocrinologist and everything at once, My doctor thought I was acting crazy and thought I need to be put on antidepressants, The left side of my brain was hurting and it's taken a year for me to recover from the first two COVID shots, I will never ever get another Cobra shot ever again, And I am of English and Dutch and Scottish and Spanish descent. And I already have a blood coagulation defect. These shots were not a good idea, It was a better idea just to let immune systems work the way they should.

  3. Em Kn Em Kn United States says:

    So what about 5, 10 years down the road? Then what? I like to see that report????

  4. Greg Piper Greg Piper United States says:

    Flagrant misinformation typical of establishment medical publishers, refusing to break out AEIs by demographic to hide the safety signal. You know myocarditis is much higher in young men from global research but refuse to specify that.

  5. withwingsIfly withwingsIfly United States says:

    Based on the variables of this study. The conclusion is useless. The study is only looking at 7 days after the vaccination which in turn is really only looking at possible causes of anaphylaxis shock and other allergic type reactions. That has not been the situation with this vaccine so the validity of the study is actually useless. Because if they would have actually taken the time to look up other increases in medical conditions up to one year post vaccine then they would have a more variety of illnesses that have went up statistically in populations that normally don't have medical conditions IE blood clots in 30-year-olds or the development of diabetes type 1 diabetes in late 20 and 30 year old males that do not fit the profile of type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post
You might also like...
Survey of previously vaccinated US residents finds the most common reasons for not getting an updated COVID-19 vaccine