Quality control measurements for medicinal gas filling

Medicinal gases must be regulated as medicinal products, with applicable pharmacopeias specifying requirements around product quality, assay or purity, impurities, identification, and employed analytical test methods.

Image Credit: apiguide/Shutterstock.com

Requirements differ between the United States Pharmacopeia (USP), European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), and Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP).

This article summarizes widely utilized filling plant measurement points alongside a range of Ph. Eur. and USP requirements related to analyzer selection.

This article should not be considered a substitute for the current official monograph, including national requirements, marketing authorization, or a validated analytical procedure.

Regulatory and analytical framework

Pharmacopeial specifications utilize official monograph methods as reference methods.

Alternative analytical methods may be used for testing under Ph. Eur. regulations following agreement with the relevant authority and the implementation of sufficient validation to demonstrate equivalence to the specified method.

Tests designed for manufacturers apply where a hospital manufactures medicinal gas on site, for example, oxygen (93%) from a PSA plant. The responsible pharmacist is required to define quality controls, operating procedures, maintenance controls, batch or traceability arrangements, and the applicable risk assessment.

The filling process and packaging must also meet applicable safety, pressure, and quality requirements where a PSA plant fills cylinders.

Process measuring points

Medicinal gas cylinders may be filled at a dedicated filling plant or at a facility utilizing an air separation unit. Cryogenic storage vessels may also be used to supply bulk medicinal gas to healthcare facilities. This product is generally stored as a cryogenic liquid before being vaporized and transferred to the filling manifold.

Single gases typically utilize a dedicated manifold, with mixtures requiring precise controls to prevent cross-contamination.

A single medicinal gas filled via a multi-cylinder manifold would require the testing of at least one cylinder from each manifold filling cycle for identity and assay. This testing is done when cylinders are changed.

Cylinders filled individually require that at least one cylinder from each uninterrupted filling cycle be tested for identity and assay.

Every cylinder should be tested for identity and assay of each component for Ph. Eur. mixtures made from two or more gases, while USP sampling and testing requirements should be implemented in line with the applicable current monograph and approved procedure.

European Pharmacopoeia measurements

The tables below feature selected manufacturer tests and limits. This list does not represent every required test; rather, it is intentionally limited to common gases.

Source: Servomex

Gas Analyte Type Official Method Limit
Air, medicinal O2 Assay Paramagnetic analyzer 20.4 to 21.4% V/V
CO Impurity Infrared analyzer ≤ 5 ppm V/V
CO2 Impurity Infrared analyzer ≤ 500 ppm V/V
H2O Impurity Electrolytic hygrometer ≤ 67 ppm V/V
Air, synthetic medicinal O2 Assay Paramagnetic analyzer 95 to 105% of nominal; nominal 21.0 to 22.5% V/V
H2O Impurity Electrolytic hygrometer ≤ 67 ppm V/V
Medical oxygen O2 Assay Paramagnetic analyzer ≥ 99.5% V/V
CO Impurity Infrared analyzer ≤ 5 ppm V/V
CO2 Impurity Infrared analyzer ≤ 300 ppm V/V
H2O Impurity Electrolytic hygrometer ≤ 67 ppm V/V
Oxygen (93 percent) O2 Assay Paramagnetic analyzer 90.0 to 96.0% V/V
CO Impurity Infrared analyzer ≤ 5 ppm V/V
CO2 Impurity Infrared analyzer ≤ 300 ppm V/V
H2O Impurity Electrolytic hygrometer ≤ 67 ppm V/V
NO + NO2 Impurity Chemiluminescence analyzer ≤ 2 ppm V/V total
SO2 Impurity UV fluorescence analyzer ≤ 1 ppm V/V
Oil Impurity Detector tube ≤ 0.1 mg/m3
CO Impurity Infrared analyzer ≤ 5 ppm V/V
CO2 Impurity Infrared analyzer ≤ 300 ppm V/V
H2O Impurity Electrolytic hygrometer ≤ 67 ppm V/V
Nitrogen N2 Assay GC with TCD ≥ 99.5% V/V
CO Impurity Infrared analyzer ≤ 5 ppm V/V
CO2 Impurity Infrared analyzer ≤ 300 ppm V/V
O2 Impurity Electrochemical oxygen analyzer ≤ 50 ppm V/V
H2O Impurity Electrolytic hygrometer ≤ 67 ppm V/V
Carbon dioxide CO2 Assay Infrared analyzer ≥ 99.5% V/V
CO Impurity GC with FID and methaniser ≤ 5 ppm V/V
Nitrous oxide N2O Assay Infrared analyzer ≥ 98.0% V/V at 15 °C
CO Impurity GC with FID and methaniser ≤ 5 ppm V/V
CO2 Impurity Infrared analyzer ≤ 300 ppm V/V
Helium He Assay GC with TCD ≥ 99.5% V/V
CH4 Impurity Infrared analyzer ≤ 50 ppm V/V
O2 Impurity Electrochemical cell ≤ 50 ppm V/V
H2O Impurity Electrolytic hygrometer ≤ 67 ppm V/V
Argon Ar Assay By deduction of impurities ≥ 99.995% V/V
O2 / N2 / CH4 Impurities GC with discharge ionization detector Each ≤ 5 ppm V/V

Scope note: Additional monograph tests may include other impurities and identification requirements. Consult the current ofÏcial monograph and the approved quality-control procedure.

United States Pharmacopoeia measurements

Selected USP requirements are summarized below.

Source: Servomex

Gas Analyte Type Official Method Limit
Medical air O2 Assay Paramagnetic analyzer 19.5 to 23.5% V/V
CO Impurity Detector tube ≤ 0.001% V/V
CO2 Impurity Detector tube ≤ 0.05% V/V
Medical oxygen O2 Assay Paramagnetic analyzer ≥ 99.0% V/V
CO / CO2 Impurity Detector tube ≤ 0.001% V/V
Oxygen 93 Percent O2 Assay Paramagnetic analyzer 90.0 to 96.0% V/V
CO Impurity Detector tube ≤ 0.001% V/V
CO2 Impurity Detector tube ≤ 0.03% V/V
Nitrogen N2 Assay Gas chromatography ≥ 99.0% V/V, indicated by O2 ≤ 1.0%
CO Impurity Detector tube ≤ 0.001% V/V
Nitrogen 97 Percent N2 Assay Gas chromatography ≥ 97.0% V/V, indicated by O2 ≤ 3.0%
CO Impurity Detector tube ≤ 0.001% V/V
CO2 Impurity Detector tube ≤ 0.03% V/V
Carbon dioxide CO2 Assay Volumetric gas absorption ≥ 99.0% V/V
CO Impurity Detector tube ≤ 0.001% V/V
Nitrous oxide N2O Assay Gas chromatography ≥ 99.0% V/V, indicated by air ≤ 1.0%
CO Impurity Detector tube ≤ 0.001% V/V
CO2 Impurity Detector tube ≤ 0.03% V/V
Helium He Assay Gas chromatography ≥ 99.0% V/V
CO Impurity Detector tube ≤ 0.001% V/V

Alternative methods

Several USP monographs specify the use of detector tube methods for impurity measurements, including carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide.

Validated analytical instruments may be used as alternative methods, where allowed by applicable regulations and quality systems, provided that these methods offer equivalence to the pharmacopeial method and that this has been demonstrated and documented.

Users should confirm acceptance of any alternative method under the current USP–NF requirements and approved quality procedures.

On-site PSA oxygen

Some healthcare facilities manufacture the oxygen and supply it directly to the medical gas pipeline system, meaning that these on-site PSA systems necessitate the implementation of a distinct quality and governance approach.

For example, single-stage PSA plants can produce oxygen (93%), with an assay range of 90.0% to 96.0% V/V. The remainder of this mixture is primarily argon and nitrogen.

Continuously monitor this output for oxygen assay, and implement continuous monitoring for carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and moisture in line with the relevant pharmacopeia specification.

Plant capacity should also be validated at maximum design flow to ensure that product quality remains within specification. Oxygen concentration can be reduced by demand above the design output.

It is important that the risk assessment considers the location of ambient air intake, locally credible contaminants, electrical resilience, maintenance, supply redundancy, traceability, and out-of-specification response.

ISO 7396-1 principles require the implementation of three independent sources of supply able to meet the design demand under a single fault condition.

Servomex measurement solutions

Source: Servomex

EU Pharmacopoeia
Measurement Declared Basis Product Declared Applications Technology
O2 assay 01/2010:0417
07/2022:1238
01/2008:1684
04/2011:2455
SERVOPRO MultiExact 4100

SERVOFLEX 5200MP
Oxygen; Oxygen (93 percent); medicinal air; medicinal synthetic air Paramagnetic sensor
CO2 and CO 01/2011:20524
01/2011:20525
SERVOPRO MultiExact 4100

SERVOFLEX 5200MP
Oxygen; Oxygen (93 percent); medicinal air; CO2 and CO in nitrogen Infrared GFX sensors
Trace O2 01/2023:1247
01/2008:1685
01/2008:2155
SERVOPRO MonoExact DF-150E / DF-310E Nitrogen (< 50 ppm); nitrogen, low oxygen (< 5 ppm); helium (< 50 ppm) Coulometric electrochemical cell

Source: Servomex

US Pharmacopoeia
Measurement Declared Basis Product Declared Applications Technology
O2 assay USP-NF 2025 SERVOPRO MultiExact 4100 Oxygen; Oxygen 93%; Medical Air Paramagnetic sensor
N2 assay USP-NF 2025 SERVOPRO Chroma 04415A1 Nitrogen; Nitrogen 97% GC with TCD

Validation and implementation checklist

A number of steps should be in place to validate and implement these systems, including:

  • Confirmation of the current official monograph and market-specific regulatory basis
  • Determining and confirming whether the test should be performed by the manufacturer, the end user, or both.
  • Documenting sample point, temperature, pressure, flow, materials, and vent arrangements.
  • Setting measurement range, detection limit, precision, accuracy, linearity, specificity, and response-time requirements.
  • Defining calibration gases, frequency, traceability, and acceptance criteria.
  • Validating the complete method against the approved reference method or filing. This should include sampling and data handling.
  • Defining out-of-specification handling, alarms, product diversion, shutdown, and record retention.
  • Confirm cybersecurity, electronic record, and audit trail requirements where necessary.

Acknowledgments

Produced from materials originally authored by Servomex.

About Servomex

For more than 70 years, Servomex has been at the forefront of gas analysis innovation, helping customers around the world improve process efficiency, product quality, safety, and regulatory compliance.

As a global leader in gas measurement solutions, Servomex designs, manufactures, and supports a comprehensive range of gas analyzers and sensing technologies for industrial, environmental, semiconductor, healthcare, pharmaceutical, energy, and research applications. The company's portfolio includes solutions for oxygen, moisture, trace impurity, and multi-gas analysis, delivering accurate and reliable measurements even in the most demanding operating conditions.

What sets Servomex apart is its unique combination of technology expertise and sensor manufacturing capability. By developing and producing many of its own core sensing technologies, Servomex maintains complete control over performance, quality, and long-term reliability. This enables customers to benefit from market-leading accuracy, low cost of ownership, and dependable operation throughout the analyzer lifecycle.

Servomex supports customers globally through dedicated engineering, service, and application teams, providing expert guidance from specification and installation through to maintenance, calibration, and long-term operational support.

With a commitment to continuous innovation and customer success, Servomex helps industries worldwide achieve greater productivity, sustainability, and operational confidence through trusted gas analysis solutions.

Servomex is part of Spectris Ltd, the productivity-enhancing instrumentation and controls company. Spectris is a leading supplier of productivity-enhancing instrumentation and controls.


Sponsored Content Policy: News-Medical.net publishes articles and related content that may be derived from sources where we have existing commercial relationships, provided such content adds value to the core editorial ethos of News-Medical.net, which is to educate and inform site visitors interested in medical research, science, medical devices and treatments.

Last updated: Nov 9, 2026 at 7:00 AM

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Servomex. (2026, November 09). Quality control measurements for medicinal gas filling. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 09, 2026 from https://www.news-medical.net/whitepaper/20261109/Quality-control-measurements-for-medicinal-gas-filling.aspx.

  • MLA

    Servomex. "Quality control measurements for medicinal gas filling". News-Medical. 09 November 2026. <https://www.news-medical.net/whitepaper/20261109/Quality-control-measurements-for-medicinal-gas-filling.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Servomex. "Quality control measurements for medicinal gas filling". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/whitepaper/20261109/Quality-control-measurements-for-medicinal-gas-filling.aspx. (accessed November 09, 2026).

  • Harvard

    Servomex. 2026. Quality control measurements for medicinal gas filling. News-Medical, viewed 09 November 2026, https://www.news-medical.net/whitepaper/20261109/Quality-control-measurements-for-medicinal-gas-filling.aspx.

Other White Papers by this Supplier

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.