German Court announces negative decision regarding validity of Aerocrine patent

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Aerocrine AB (STO:AEROB) today announced a negative decision by the Munich Court regarding the validity of one German Aerocrine patent.  This decision does not influence Medisoft's obligation to respect the existing three courts decisions in Germany.

In September of 2009, the District Court of Düsseldorf announced its decisions that the Medisoft device Hyp'Air FeNO infringes the German counterparts of Aerocrine's patents EP 0 606 351 B1, EP 1 439 781 B1 and EP 0 724 723 B1. These European patents also cover Belgium, Switzerland, Spain, France, United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands and Sweden. The judgments were subsequently appealed by Medisoft and Medisoft also filed invalidity proceedings against the three Aerocrine patents in Germany.

In January 2011, the Court of Appeal in Dusseldorf confirmed the decisions by the District Court in 2009 that the Medisoft device infringes Aerocrine's patents EP 0 606 351 B1 and EP 1 439 781 B1. The Court of Appeal will also revisit Medisoft's appeal of the infringement of Aerocrine's EP 0 724 723 B1 patent following the positive decision described below by the Federal Patent Court, as well as decide on Medisoft's infringement of the amended claim in the same patent.

In February 2011, the validity of the German part of Aerocrine's EP 0 724 723 B1 patent was examined at a hearing at the Federal Patent Court in Munich. The patent was upheld following a change of the infringed patent claim. An additional patent claim in the EP 0 724 723 B1 patent, that was removed from the original District Court procedure in 2009 pending a decision regarding the patentability of this claim, was upheld by the Federal Patent Court with a similar change of this claim.

Yesterday, the Munich Court provided its decision that the German counterpart of Aerocrine patent EP 0 606 351 B1 is not patentable in Germany. This decision was not based on any new information, but represents an opposing view by the Court regarding the patent claims compared to the European Patent Office that granted the patent in 1999 and also upheld the patent following opposition in 2002. The EP 0 606 351 B1 patent is Aerocrine's earliest patent and expires in 2012. Aerocrine has the right to appeal the decision.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.