USAID Administrator Shah addresses agency's FY13 budget proposal at House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Speaking Tuesday at a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing, USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah said USAID's FY 2013 budget proposal "is slightly lower than last year," but that "future U.S. foreign aid investments will be more 'prioritized, focused and concentrated,'" and he "promised that U.S. aid will still be able to meet global development challenges," VOA's "Breaking News" blog reports (3/21). "While foreign assistance represents less than one percent of our budget, we are committed to improving our efficiency and maximizing the value of every dollar," Shah said, according to a transcript of his testimony. Shah outlined how the "budget prioritizes our USAID Forward suite of reforms," noting efforts in the Global Health Initiative and Feed the Future programs, among others, according to his speech (3/20).

Shah "faced sharp questioning" from House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), "who called on USAID to consider cutting back aid to countries that no longer need support," VOA writes (3/21). Ros-Lehtinen also expressed her objection to the budget proposal's "increase in money for family planning and reproductive health [FP/RH], especially when all other global health accounts decline." A press release on the committee's website highlighted a letter Ros-Lehtinen sent to House Budget Committee Chair Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) detailing additional FP/RH funding concerns. According to the release, the letter expresses Ros-Lehtinen's "objection to the Administration's $39 million assistance to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)"; raises "the Committee Majority's opposition to the Administration's reversal of the Mexico City Policy," or "global gag rule," which banned federal funding from going to foreign non-governmental organizations that perform or provide information about or referral for the procedure as a method of family planning, using funds from any source; and states that "funding for family planning and reproductive health activities under the FY13 request should be reduced and re-allocated to critical sectors of global health currently marked for cuts" (3/21).


http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Neural implants face ethical hurdles, study finds