First-line sunitinib superior to everolimus for metastatic RCC

By Lynda Williams, Senior medwireNews Reporter

Results for the RECORD-3 trial support the current strategy of first-line sunitinib followed by second-line everolimus for the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

As explained in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, the phase II study researchers hypothesised that first-line everolimus followed by second-line sunitinib at the first sign of disease progression would be better tolerated than the reverse and would therefore offer patients better progression-free survival (PFS).

However, median PFS to the start of second-line treatment was significantly lower for the 238 patients who were randomly assigned to receive first-line everolimus than for the 233 patients given first-line sunitinib, at 7.9 versus 10.7 months and with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.4.

This HR was above the prespecified value of 1.1 for the primary endpoint; the one-sided 90% confidence interval upper limit was 1.64, in excess of the prespecified margin of 1.27.

Thus, the study failed to show noninferiority for first-line everolimus versus first-line sunitinib, say Robert Motzer, from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, USA, and co-authors.

“These clinically relevant differences support the standard treatment sequence, whereby patients who experience progression on (or are intolerant of) first-line sunitinib are subsequently treated with everolimus”, they write.

Overall, 45% of patients given first-line everolimus switched to second-line treatment, as did 43% of those given first-line sunitinib.

The median combined PFS was 21.1 months for patients given first-line everolimus then second-line sunitinib versus 25.8 months for first-line sunitinib followed by second-line everolimus; the difference was nonsignificant.

Median overall survival was 22.4 months for first-line everolimus and then second-line sunitinib and 32.0 months for first-line sunitinib then second-line everolimus, and again the difference between the treatment arms did not reach statistical significance.

Patients in the first-line everolimus and first-line sunitinib groups reported similar side effects, with stomatitis (53 and 57%), fatigue (45 and 51%), and diarrhoea (38 and 57%), the most common.

“The observed [adverse events] were consistent with the known safety profiles of everolimus and sunitinib and differentiated by their respective mTOR [mammalian target of rapamycin] inhibitor and VEGFR [vascular endothelial growth factor receptor] tyrosine kinase inhibitor class,” Motzer and team observe.

They conclude: “The trial results support the standard treatment paradigm of first-line sunitinib followed by everolimus at progression”.

Licensed from medwireNews with permission from Springer Healthcare Ltd. ©Springer Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved. Neither of these parties endorse or recommend any commercial products, services, or equipment.


The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
You might also like...
Study focuses on new approach that delivers a "one-two punch" to help T cells attack solid tumors