Study finds no substantial gender differences in multitasking performance

Women and men perform equally when required to switch attention between tasks or perform two tasks simultaneously, according to a new study in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Patricia Hirsch of Aachen University in Germany and colleagues. The finding adds to a growing literature that contradicts the widely held belief that women multitask better than men.

Multitasking—performing several independent tasks within a short time—requires rapidly and frequently switching attention from one task to another, increasing the cognitive demand, compared to completing single tasks in sequence. Despite scant evidence for gender differences, the popular perception is overwhelmingly that women are better at multitasking than men.

In the current study, the authors compared the abilities of 48 men and 48 women in performance of letter or number identification tasks. Some experiments required participants to pay attention to two tasks at once (concurrent multitasking), while others required them to switch attention between tasks (sequential multitasking). The researchers measured reaction time and accuracy for the multitasking experiments and for single task controls. They found that multitasking imposed a substantial cost on both speed and accuracy for both men and women, and there was no difference between the two groups in the magnitude of the cost.

The set of potential tasks and the cognitive operations underlying them is vast, and no single experiment can encompass all of them, the authors note. Discrepancies in the literature on gender differences in multi-tasking may reflect differences in the specific types of tasks assessed. However, the large sample size and lack of gender difference seen in this study indicate that at least for the underlying cognitive processes tested here--working memory updating, the engagement and disengagement of task sets, and inhibition—men and women do just as well, or just as poorly, when trying to multitask.

Hirsch adds:

The present findings strongly suggest that there are no substantial gender differences in multitasking performance across task-switching and dual-task paradigms, which predominantly measure cognitive control mechanisms such as working memory updating, the engagement and disengagement of task sets, and inhibition."

Source:
Journal reference:

Hirsch, P. et al. (2019) Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations. PLOS ONE. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220150.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    PLOS ONE. (2019, August 16). Study finds no substantial gender differences in multitasking performance. News-Medical. Retrieved on September 22, 2019 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20190816/Study-finds-no-substantial-gender-differences-in-multitasking-performance.aspx.

  • MLA

    PLOS ONE. "Study finds no substantial gender differences in multitasking performance". News-Medical. 22 September 2019. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20190816/Study-finds-no-substantial-gender-differences-in-multitasking-performance.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    PLOS ONE. "Study finds no substantial gender differences in multitasking performance". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20190816/Study-finds-no-substantial-gender-differences-in-multitasking-performance.aspx. (accessed September 22, 2019).

  • Harvard

    PLOS ONE. 2019. Study finds no substantial gender differences in multitasking performance. News-Medical, viewed 22 September 2019, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20190816/Study-finds-no-substantial-gender-differences-in-multitasking-performance.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment
Post
You might also like... ×
Study suggests link between environmental pollution and increase in psychiatric disorders